Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 16 · 2026-11-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In some countries, more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in.

What are the reasons for this?

How can people research this?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

At a very suspecious aspect , a lot of individuals are gaining interests about the history of query of accomudations they are utilising over a period.They are typically involved in the inquiry of infrastructure , safety , reliability and modification that were priviously made to the accomudations .

The majority of the suspeciuos facts of individuals are about the safety and hazards of old buildings .Firstly , the persons wants to gain knowledge of the houses built by their ancestors .Furthermore , the property value and the current budget of this building . The enhanced sale and purchase value of property gives the greater impact on the social honour. Majorirty of individuals are interested in finding the knowledge of struggles their ancestors did for the house .For example, in pakistan the rural people are more influenced by the hard working of their ancestor ,they keep the house same as it was build in old ages following the respect and honour of ancestor hard working.

People who are influenced by the historical conctruction of house and the city they live in can reseach about them by talking to neibours,in news , articles, old memories and historical reportings .

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

You identify several relevant reasons for researching a home’s past, including safety hazards, family ancestry, property value and respect for ancestors. The Pakistan example gives one idea some context. However, the response addresses the task only partially: the reasons are listed rather than clearly explained, and the research methods receive only one brief sentence. “Talking to neighbours” and consulting “articles” or “historical reportings” are mentioned, but you do not explain how these sources could help or give a concrete example. The response is also 53 words below the required minimum, which limits the space available to develop both parts. To strengthen the answer, explain each main reason and describe several practical research methods in more detail.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

There is some organisation: the opening introduces the topic, the next section discusses reasons, and the final sentence turns to research methods. Basic signposting such as “Firstly” and “Furthermore” helps readers recognise a list of points. However, progression is not consistently clear. The opening mentions infrastructure, safety and modification, but these points are not developed in a clear sequence; the paragraph then shifts among ancestors, property value and social honour. The final paragraph is very short and does not connect its list of sources into a developed explanation. Use separate, focused paragraphs for reasons and research methods, and link each supporting example directly to the point it illustrates.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You attempt topic-related vocabulary, including “property value,” “hazards,” “historical construction” and “ancestors,” so the reader can identify the general subject. However, the range is limited and several inaccurate or unnatural choices make parts difficult to understand, such as “suspecious aspect,” “history of query of accomudations” and “social honour.” Spelling errors, including “priviously,” “neibours” and “conctruction,” are also noticeable. Some phrases appear to be direct translations and do not express the intended meaning clearly. Build a reliable set of collocations for buildings and research, and check spelling and word forms. For example, use “investigate a property’s history” rather than “inquiry of infrastructure,” and “historical records” rather than “historical reportings.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt some longer sentence forms, including a sentence beginning “For example” and one using “that were previously made,” but control is inconsistent. Errors in agreement and sentence structure occur in “the persons wants” and “the majority of the suspicious facts of individuals are about,” where the intended relationship between the ideas is unclear. Articles and plurals are also unreliable, as in “the house” when referring generally to houses and “their ancestor.” Punctuation and spacing around commas and full stops need attention, and several sentences are fragments or incomplete lists, such as “Furthermore, the property value and the current budget of this building.” Practise writing complete subject–verb sentences, then combine related ideas with accurate clauses.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.