Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 16 · 2026-08-08

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In some countries, more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in.

What are the reasons for this?

How can people research this?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In some nations, individuals are gradually getting passionate about doing research in the history of the homes or apartment they live in. This essay highlights the the primary reasons of the statement and how can individuals research this.

To begin with, in the recent years people get attracted to the things were lots of hidden information can achieved due to this they may get something iconic and rare where they may get rich and famous. The people who get influence to know the history about abandoned housed are mostly the researchers. In which, they find how the architecture and design of the buildings and houses were there. Moreover, in some countries government are also funding the people who do the research in any of the topic and this is one of it. This can also beneficial at some point for instance, which type of wood they were using to built the houses and what's the design and technology they were implementing to make the room cool naturally.

Furthermore, for this types of research an individual needs the patience because this work holds lot's of fluctuation. People needs a good level of interest due to that they can be more focused and find out the hidden data. Which can be useful in today's world and make the citizens lives easy. For instance, in 2016, famous researcher Mr. Shailesh Patil made a huge research on which type of stones were used in early period. After that, he got succeed.

In conclusion, there are several reason t do research in various type of stuff. So, one of it is history of houses and building

. However, people who do research need the passion to do it and make the work beneficial for a country .

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

The response addresses both parts of the prompt, but the development of ideas is limited and sometimes lacks clarity. While you mention reasons such as potential financial gain and architectural interest, these points are not fully explored. The section on how to research is particularly weak; it focuses more on the personal qualities required (patience) rather than practical methods like consulting archives, land registries, or local libraries. The example provided about Mr. Shailesh Patil is vague and does not clearly illustrate a research methodology. To improve, ensure that each reason and method is supported by clear, logical explanations and concrete, relevant examples.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5

The essay is organized into paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. However, the logical progression within paragraphs is often disrupted by awkward phrasing and unclear connections. For instance, the transition 'due to this they may get something iconic' is confusing. Cohesive devices are used, but they are often mechanical or misused, such as 'In which' at the start of a sentence or 'So, one of it is' in the conclusion. The referencing is sometimes unclear, making it difficult to track the flow of your argument. Improving the use of linking words and ensuring each sentence builds logically on the previous one will enhance coherence.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

The vocabulary is generally basic and repetitive. You rely on simple terms like 'things', 'stuff', and 'get', which limits the precision of your writing. There are also several instances of incorrect word choice and collocation, such as 'getting passionate about doing research in the history' (should be 'into the history') and 'this work holds lot's of fluctuation' (which is unclear). While you attempt some topic-specific vocabulary like 'architecture' and 'technology', the overall range is insufficient to express complex ideas with precision. Expanding your vocabulary to include more academic collocations and precise terminology would significantly improve your score.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede communication. Common issues include subject-verb agreement ('government are', 'people needs'), incorrect preposition usage, and awkward sentence construction ('how can individuals research this' used as a statement). Punctuation is also inconsistent, with unnecessary spaces before periods and incorrect apostrophe usage ('lot's'). While the meaning is generally understandable, the high frequency of errors in basic grammar prevents the writing from reaching a higher band. Focusing on proofreading for subject-verb agreement and article usage would be a beneficial next step.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.