Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 16 · 2026-09-18

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In some countries, more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in.

What are the reasons for this?

How can people research this?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In some countries, are becoming finding their ancestor route throughout the historical house or building. They are research about the a site near by or different any building through local people.they have desire personals percepective about them of explore about them infrastructre of oldest civilisation.

There are several key reasons behind this growing curiosity. Primarily, discovering a home's background fosters a deeper sense of identity and place. Learning that a property was built during a specific historical era or occupied by notable historical figures transforms a simple physical structure into a narrative-rich environment. Furthermore, practical considerations play a major role, particularly for those undertaking renovations. Understanding a building's original materials, structural alterations, or past damage is essential for maintaining safety and adhering to local historical conservation guidelines. For example, homeowners in historic European cities often need to verify whether timber frames or exterior brickwork are original before making modifications.

To research a property’s history, individuals can utilize a combination of official documentation and community knowledge. Public archives and municipal land registries are the most reliable starting points, as they hold title deeds, building permits, and original architectural plans that reveal precise construction dates and boundary changes. Additionally, census records and historical trade directories allow researchers to trace the occupations and family sizes of former residents over decades. Complementing these official documents, local historical societies, libraries, and long-standing neighbors often provide qualitative context, such as old photographs, newspaper clippings, or oral accounts detailing how the surrounding area evolved.

In conclusion, most peoples are becoming a reseacher fields master they have reached many of things in their life. My opinions of the eassy the wanna escape form reality they want to buesy that to choose finding a historicals of the house holds or buildings.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.0
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource6.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.5
Overall6.0

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses both parts of the task—the reasons for researching a building's history and how to conduct such research. The body paragraphs are well-developed, offering clear reasons such as identity and practical renovation needs, alongside concrete research methods like public archives and oral accounts. However, the introduction and conclusion contain severe linguistic confusion, rendering parts of those sections nearly incomprehensible, as seen in the phrase 'most peoples are becoming a reseacher fields master'. Consequently, the development is somewhat uneven, pulling the score down from higher bands because the framing paragraphs fail to set up and resolve the task effectively.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The body paragraphs demonstrate clear logical organization and progression, utilizing appropriate cohesive devices such as 'Furthermore', 'Additionally', and 'Complementing these official documents' to link ideas smoothly. Paragraphing is used sufficiently and appropriately, separating the introduction, reasons, methods, and conclusion. However, the overall coherence is significantly disrupted by the introduction and conclusion, which feature disjointed sentences and unclear referencing, such as 'They are research about the a site near by'. Because the core body is logical while the outer framing is faulty, the score reflects a transitional band where organizational strengths are undermined by localized cohesion breakdowns.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The student demonstrates a surprisingly capable range of vocabulary within the body paragraphs, successfully employing topic-specific terms such as 'architectural plans', 'historical conservation guidelines', and 'qualitative context'. Nevertheless, the lexical control is inconsistent. The introduction and conclusion suffer from severe word-choice and collocation errors, such as 'ancestor route', 'reseacher fields master', and 'buesy that to choose'. These errors occasionally impede communication in the outer paragraphs, preventing the response from achieving a higher score despite the solid lexical performance in the middle sections.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The response displays a mix of simple and complex sentence forms. In the body paragraphs, the writer constructs some well-controlled, complex sentences, such as 'Learning that a property was built during a specific historical era or occupied by notable historical figures transforms a simple physical structure into a narrative-rich environment.' However, grammatical accuracy is notably weak in the introduction and conclusion, featuring major structural errors like 'In some countries, are becoming finding' and 'the wanna escape form reality'. These frequent errors in basic sentence architecture and tense usage cause difficulty for the reader in the bookend paragraphs, placing the grammar firmly in the mid-range.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.