Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 16 · 2026-09-20

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In some countries, more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in.

What are the reasons for this?

How can people research this?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

In recent year, there is an ongoing debate about historical building. It is widely recognized that it history building has increased significantly over the year. in my opinion, this issue are various negetive problem, but there are a number of effective research, in this essay, I shall explain my point of view by analyzing the arguments in verious perspective.

one of the most significant problem associated with histroy bulid is that people want to know who lived in the house previously. Furthermore, the impact of this issue extend beyond just the individual level, affecting societty as a whole. Foe instance, a large number of young people follow his grandfather culture. Moreover, people are curious about the past of their home, which may lead to they feel more connected to their home. Therefore, this issue can have a negetive impact on both individaul and society.

Nevertheless, there are possible research in this view that should be considered. One significant research is people can research it through the internet and public records . For example, they can find information about previous owners, the age of the building and past changes. which can improve they can understand the history of their home more cleary. Therefore, these measures can help address the research associated with history buildind.

In conculsion, although this issue can have various reason and there are a number of research to associated it. Ultimately, it is imperative that government and citizen work togrther to ensure that to understand the history of their home. Only by addressing these challenges head-on can we hope to achieve a sustainable balance in the future.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0

The response addresses both parts of the prompt—reasons why people research their building's history and how they can research it. However, the development of ideas is limited and at times confused. For instance, the student states in the second paragraph that 'one of the most significant problem associated with histroy bulid is that people want to know who lived in the house previously,' which conflates a reason with a problem. The position is somewhat unclear due to awkward phrasing and circular reasoning. Examples are very brief and lack adequate expansion. While the writer attempts to answer all parts of the task, the overall execution places the response firmly within the lower-middle bands. To improve, the student should ensure that reasons and research methods are clearly distinguished, fully elaborated, and supported by concrete, relevant examples rather than vague generalisations.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0

The text is organized into four paragraphs, following a standard essay structure, but the progression of ideas is frequently disrupted by poor cohesion and mechanical transitions. Phrases like 'In recent year' and 'in my opinion, this issue are various negetive problem' create a disjointed reading experience. Cohesive devices such as 'Furthermore,' 'Moreover,' and 'Therefore' are overused or used inappropriately where logical links do not hold. Paragraphing is attempted, but internal cohesion is weak, and referencing is often unclear, such as 'which can improve they can understand the history of their home more cleary.' The overall arrangement provides a basic framework, but logical flow is frequently compromised by grammatical and lexical barriers, limiting the score for this criterion.

Lexical Resource — Band 4.5

The lexical resource is quite limited and heavily impacted by frequent word choice errors, incorrect word forms, and spelling mistakes. Examples from the text include 'histroy bulid' instead of historical building, 'verious perspective' for various perspectives, and 'negetive problem' for negative issues. The vocabulary is repetitive, relying heavily on basic terms like 'issue,' 'research,' and 'problem.' While the student attempts to use less common vocabulary such as 'sustainable balance' in the conclusion, these attempts often result in awkward collocations or are grammatically incorrect in context. The errors cause some difficulty for the reader and impede smooth communication, reflecting the descriptors for a band 4.5 to 5.0.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 4.5

Grammatical control is weak throughout the essay, with a very limited range of structures and frequent errors. Simple sentences often contain basic agreement errors, such as 'this issue are various negetive problem.' Attempts at complex sentences are frequently faulty, leading to fragmented or run-on structures, such as 'For example, they can find information about previous owners, the age of the building and past changes. which can improve they can understand the history of their home more cleary.' Punctuation is also problematic, with incorrect capitalization at the start of sentences ('in my opinion') and missing commas. Errors are frequent and often cause strain for the reader, placing this performance in the band 4.5 to 5.0 range.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.