Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 16 · 2026-09-24

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In some countries, more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in.

What are the reasons for this?

How can people research this?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Recently, gradual increase in trend of investigation history of the plce in which people reside in few countries. There may be various reasons for tracing the history of house or building. This essay will discuss reason and various ways through of searching information about residency.

Mainly, reason for finding out account of the house or buliding is saftey. When finding a house, people not only keeps convience in mind but also find the safe place to live in. For instance, Some countries such as India, Afganisthan, South africa have sifnificantly higher crime index in world. However, the people of these countries usually prefer area where crime rates are nearly to none so, they can live there peacefully with fear of getting robbed, killed or rapped. Ultimatly, their motive behind digging the past is safety.

Furthermore, due to technological advancement has benefical for this kind of search. Establishing connect with resident of area you are intrested in can be efficient. For instance, Goolgle reviews usually has review of majority all places in world. By taking reviews of people to account can help individual to find more information about the merits and demerits of the place. There are many such means by which individual can stay connected with eachother. Social media and websites benefits the most. Moreover, personally visiting the place is fare more advantageous then other ways.

In conclusion,due to drastic surge in rates of crime in countries lately it's necessary to investigate te area previously before moving in. Numerous routes are avaliable to carry out search of interested place from which visiting the place dominates the most.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

The response attempts to address both parts of the prompt, discussing reasons for researching a building's history and ways to conduct such research. However, the interpretation of the prompt leans heavily toward safety and crime rates rather than historical interest, resulting in some under-developed ideas regarding architectural or social history. For example, the student states, 'Mainly, reason for finding out account of the house or buliding is saftey,' which misinterprets the core premise of historical inquiry. While the research methods are partially explored through mentions of Google reviews and visiting the place, the explanations remain somewhat superficial. Consequently, the task is addressed only partially, warranting a band score of 5.0 in accordance with the official descriptors.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The essay displays some organizational structure with a clear introduction and conclusion, but overall progression is hindered by awkward transitions and disjointed phrasing. For instance, the transition 'Furthermore, due to technological advancement has benefical for this kind of search' contains grammatical errors and fails to logically connect the previous paragraph to research methods. Paragraphing is attempted, but the body paragraphs mix ideas about safety, crime, and online reviews rather than maintaining a clear focus. Cohesive devices are frequently inadequate, inaccurate, or repetitive, such as the overuse of 'for instance' and simple connectors. Referencing and logical progression are occasionally unclear, reflecting the characteristics of a band 5.0 performance.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The student uses a limited and occasionally repetitive vocabulary, with noticeable errors that occasionally cause difficulty for the reader. Examples of awkward word choice and spelling mistakes include 'plce' instead of place, 'buliding' instead of building, 'saftey' instead of safety, and 'rapped' instead of raped. While the writer attempts some less common vocabulary such as 'technological advancement' and 'advantageous,' inaccuracies in collocation and word formation persist throughout the text, such as 'investigation history' and 'fare more advantageous.' These lexical limitations restrict the range to a minimally adequate level, aligning well with the criteria for band 5.0.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response features a limited range of sentence structures, with frequent grammatical errors that often cause difficulty for the reader. Simple sentences dominate, and attempts at complex structures are frequently faulty, such as 'Recently, gradual increase in trend of investigation history of the plce in which people reside in few countries.' There are pervasive errors in article usage, subject-verb agreement, and prepositions, including 'By taking reviews of people to account' and 'investigate te area previously before moving in.' Punctuation is also problematic in places. Because the frequent errors hinder smooth readability and complex structures are poorly controlled, the response fits the band 5.0 descriptor.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.