Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · Cambridge IELTS 16 · 2026-10-03

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In some countries, more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in.

What are the reasons for this?

How can people research this?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 4.5)

There is a prevailing observation that a significant amount of people are rapidly started to take interest in exploring more information about their house or they are focusing to rebuild their current houses. People emphasize more on rebuilding their home which have a lot of benefits.

There is an evident increase in the financial value of lands and properties. With the passage of time, people have come to observe the prices of their properties. Primarly, a particular reason behind this rise of prices is that, a lot of undeniably commercial construction is taking place. Due to this construction, properties situated in the radius of that one particular landmark gets beneficial boost in their value.

Moreover, humen population has significantly rise in the past decade. World have seen the World's most fasted hike in numbers. The human to body proportion have shrunk, this constitutes in the significant raise of people in taking the decision of rebuilding their home. Reconstructing a house have undoubtedly various advantages. One of the most dominating factor about building a house is land, once poeple have a firm decision about land portion, they have a transparent roadmap in constructing their property.

The economical situation nowadays clearly justifies people accounting for these financial decisions. People can merely think of moving to a new piece of land, buying it and try to build something over it.

These are some of the bedrocks behind this holistic approach. By applyting this, people tends to save a lot of money and have a financial freedom.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 3.5

The response addresses the task only partially and struggles to maintain a clear focus on the prompt. While the prompt asks for the reasons people research the history of their houses and how they can research this, the student largely drifts into discussing why people rebuild or reconstruct their homes due to financial and property value reasons, such as 'an evident increase in the financial value of lands and properties.' The second part of the prompt—how people can actually research their home's history—is entirely omitted. Ideas are limited and under-developed, relying on repetitive assertions rather than clear examples or explanations of historical research methods. To improve towards higher bands, the writer must ensure all parts of the prompt are fully answered, directly addressing both the reasons for investigating building history and the practical research methods involved.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.0

The response displays some organization, but there is no clear overall progression of ideas, resulting in a somewhat disjointed structure. Paragraphing is attempted, but transitions between paragraphs feel abrupt and lack logical connection, such as the sudden shift from property values to human population growth in the third paragraph. Cohesive devices are used minimally and sometimes inaccurately, leading to a mechanical flow where referencing is not always clear (e.g., 'By applyting this, people tends to...'). To achieve a higher band, the writer needs to ensure a smoother logical progression from one idea to the next, using a wider and more accurate range of cohesive devices to link sentences and paragraphs effectively, while making sure every paragraph directly supports a central theme related to the prompt.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is limited and minimally adequate for the task, containing noticeable errors that occasionally cause difficulty for the reader. The writer attempts some less common vocabulary, but this frequently leads to awkward phrasing or incorrect word choice, such as 'humen population has significantly rise' and 'finacial freedom.' There are also noticeable spelling and word-form errors like 'Primarly' and 'applyting.' While the vocabulary is sufficient to convey a basic drift of meaning, the frequent slips in word formation and collocation prevent the response from achieving a higher band. To improve, the writer should focus on expanding their working vocabulary, ensuring accurate word forms, and checking spelling carefully before finishing.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response demonstrates a limited range of grammatical structures, relying heavily on simple sentences alongside attempts at more complex forms that are frequently faulty. There are persistent errors in verb tenses, subject-verb agreement, and plurals throughout the text, such as 'more and more people are becoming... are rapidly started' and 'properties situated in the radius of that one particular landmark gets beneficial boost.' These frequent errors can cause some difficulty for the reader in untangling the intended meaning. To move up to the next band, the writer must demonstrate better control over basic grammatical patterns, ensure accurate subject-verb agreement, and produce a higher proportion of error-free sentences when attempting complex sentence structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.