Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 16 · 2026-10-04
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
In some countries, more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in.
What are the reasons for this?
How can people research this?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
In many nations, many and many individuals are becoming interested in observing out finding the history of the house.this essay is going to discuss about the research and reason for history.
on the onehand there are some major reasons why individuals are interested in finding about the history of the house or building they live in. from a psychological standpoint people naturally possess an intrinsic desire to connect with the past and learning about who previously inhabited their living spaces fosters a deeper sense of belonging and place.for instance, discovering that a house was constructed during a arhilectural era and household a historical figure adds unique sentimental value. on is the most practical level, understanding a building structural and legal lineage is most essential for our hometown investigating damages or other blue print helps ownwers assess for saftey,maintenance needs and market value of their investments.
To uncover this information individuals can utilize several imvestigative avenues the most reliable method is consulting official government archive and municipial property.furthermore digitaldata base is local history societies have made this process highly accessible through digitalize old maps and new archive.
In conclusion the fascination with the homes bacground stems for both a sentimental quiest for historical connection and a practical needs to safeguard ones financial investment and by the public administrative archive and engaging with local community members residents and easily build a comprehensive timeline of their property's past.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
The response addresses the main parts of the task by discussing both the reasons for researching a home's history and the methods for doing so, but ideas are only partially developed. Additionally, the task requirement of a minimum of 250 words was not met, as the response contains only 224 words (with 11 words copied from the prompt uncounted). While the essay mentions psychological desires and practical maintenance needs, these points remain limited and lack sufficient extension or detailed examples. The introduction is overly brief and informal, and the conclusion simply restates the main points without adding closure or further depth. To reach a higher level, the writer needs to expand upon their ideas with more thorough explanations and ensure the word count requirement is fully satisfied.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0
The essay displays a coherent overall arrangement with clear paragraph breaks separating the introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. However, the progression of ideas is sometimes hindered by mechanical or faulty cohesion and inadequate referencing. For instance, transitional phrases like 'on the onehand' lack proper spacing and standard capitalization, and referencing devices are occasionally unclear, such as 'on is the most practical level' where 'on' appears to be a typographical error for 'one'. Paragraphing is used sufficiently to structure the response into logical sections, but the internal flow within paragraphs could be improved by using a wider variety of accurate cohesive devices. To progress further, the writer must ensure smoother transitions between sentences and more precise referencing to enhance the overall readability.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
The vocabulary range is limited and minimally adequate for the task. The student attempts some less common vocabulary, such as 'psychological standpoint', 'intrinsic desire', and 'sentimental value', but these attempts are frequently marred by noticeable errors in word choice, spelling, and word form. Examples include 'observing out finding' instead of 'finding out', 'arhilectural' instead of 'architectural', 'household' instead of 'housed', 'imvestigative' instead of 'investigative', 'municipial' instead of 'municipal', and 'quiest' instead of 'quest'. These errors cause some difficulty for the reader and reflect a lack of precision. To achieve a higher band, the writer needs to expand their lexical repertoire and ensure correct spelling, word formation, and collocation when using more advanced terminology.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
The response demonstrates a limited range of grammatical structures, relying heavily on simple sentences alongside a few attempts at complex forms that are often faulty. There are frequent errors in punctuation, articles, plurals, and subject-verb agreement, which can cause difficulty for the reader. For example, sentences often lack proper terminal punctuation and capitalization, as seen in '.this essay is going to discuss' and 'place.for instance'. Furthermore, issues arise with noun phrases and prepositions, such as 'finding about the history' and 'stems for both'. Complex sentence attempts contain structural flaws, and the persistence of basic grammatical inaccuracies prevents the writing from achieving better flow. To improve, the writer should focus on mastering complex sentence patterns and reducing basic punctuation and agreement errors.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.