Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 16 · 2026-10-05

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In some countries, more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in.

What are the reasons for this?

How can people research this?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

In many nations, a great number of people are eager to have a vast knowlegde about the history of homes they are currently using. i believe this is because the archetectural layout of the buildings stood out among others and secondary they are curious to know about materials that they were used.

To begin with, there are various reasons to why people are interested in knowing about olden structures. This could be as the result of the foundation of the house and how it has stayed for decades of years without being damage. Another could be that they want to have an ideal of what brought a particular impression of them construsting such houses.For instance, the people of Mkar coummunity are interested in knowing the inspiration behind the NKST church that was built in 1956 and is still standing without cracks.

Another reason was centered on the kinds of building materials that were used as of that time and the design that prompt them to construct such buildings. This will help those researchers to use find ways of constructing mansions that can stand for a number of years. This also make site builders to find solustions to their problems that seems so difficulty. Lets also consider the aspect of story telling, people are motivated to know about this places because of the value such homes provide in the society. For example, the pottery home in Kubwa is well structured and that has created serious attension to while it was built. Therefore, it is important that people should have an ideal of the places they stay in.

In conclusion, while it is in important to live in houses and other buildings, it is also neccessary for occupants, visitors, and historians to have a broad knowledge about where they are living or visiting. This will help people know more about places.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response4.5
Coherence and Cohesion5.0
Lexical Resource5.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

The response addresses the task only partially, presenting limited and under-developed ideas. While the writer attempts to answer both parts of the prompt regarding the reasons people research their homes and how they can do so, the coverage remains quite superficial. For instance, the reasons given, such as architectural layout and materials, are stated simply without deep elaboration. Furthermore, the second part of the prompt concerning how people can research this history is largely missing or overly vague, mentioning only that researchers want to find ways to construct mansions and solve problems, rather than detailing actual research methods like archives, public records, or architectural surveys. The position is not always clearly sustained throughout, resulting in an essay that covers the task minimally in terms of depth and specific examples.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

There is some organisation present, such as the use of paragraph breaks and basic transitional markers like 'To begin with' and 'In conclusion', but the response lacks a clear overall progression. The logical flow between sentences and paragraphs is frequently disrupted by abrupt shifts in ideas. For example, the transition between discussing building materials in paragraph three and shifting into storytelling feels disjointed. Additionally, cohesive devices are often inadequate or inaccurate, with referencing that is not always clear, such as the ambiguous pronoun use in phrases like 'what brought a particular impression of them construsting such houses'. Paragraphing is attempted, but internal cohesion within the paragraphs remains weak and repetitive, preventing a smooth, logical progression of thoughts.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is limited and minimally adequate for the task. The writer relies heavily on basic terminology and makes noticeable errors in word choice, word form, and spelling that occasionally cause some difficulty for the reader. Examples of lexical inaccuracies include 'knowlegde' instead of knowledge, 'archetectural' instead of architectural, 'construsting' instead of constructing, and 'solustions' instead of solutions. Less common lexical items are attempted, such as 'inspiration', but they are often marred by collocation issues or awkward phrasing, such as 'created serious attension to while it was built'. These recurring errors reflect a restricted lexical range that struggles to convey precise meanings clearly and naturally.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response demonstrates a limited range of grammatical structures, relying heavily on repetitive sentence patterns. While there are some attempts at complex sentences, these are frequently faulty, leading to frequent errors that can cause difficulty for the reader. Issues include problems with subject-verb agreement, awkward preposition usage inside grammatical patterns, and persistent punctuation errors, such as missing capitalisation at the start of sentences and run-on phrasing. Examples of grammatical lapses include 'homes they are currently using' and 'This could be as the result of the foundation of the house and how it has stayed for decades of years without being damage'. These persistent errors across basic and complex forms highlight a need for stronger control over grammar and sentence construction.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.