Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 16 · 2026-10-12
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
In some countries, more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in.
What are the reasons for this?
How can people research this?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.5)
Nowdays, an increasing number of people are interested in discovering the history of the houses or buildings they live in.
There are several reasons why people want to learn about their home past. Firstly, they may be curious about the pervious owners and the events that took place there. Secondly, older buildings may have historical or cultural importanc, which makes their residents interested in perserving their heritage. Another reason is that people may want to know wether their property has undergone major changes or renovations before they purchased it. For example, a person living in an old house may wish to discover when it was built and who lived there previously.
There are various ways to research the history of a building. one effective method is to visit local goverment offices, where property records can provide information about pervious owners and the orginal date of construction. Another useful apporach is to search online archives, historical websites and old newspaper. In addition, people can speak older neighbours or pervious owners, as they may have valueable information about the property. For, instance, long term residents of a neighbourhood may remember how a building looked several decades ago and explain how it has changed over time.
In concclusion, people are increasingly interested in the history of their homes because of curiosity, historical significance and a desire to understand their property better. They can investigate this information through offical records, online resources and conversation with people who have lived in the area for many years
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 7.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 7.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.5 |
| Overall | 6.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0
The response addresses both questions directly: it gives several reasons for interest in a building’s past and outlines practical research methods. The reasons—curiosity about previous occupants, historical or cultural significance, and learning about renovations—are relevant, while the examples of checking records and asking long-term neighbours help support the methods. The conclusion also brings the main points together. To strengthen the response further, develop some ideas beyond brief statements: for instance, explain why knowing about earlier renovations matters to residents, or give a more specific example of how a local archive could reveal a building’s history. Overall, the ideas are clear and supported, though some remain general.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0
The essay has a clear, effective structure: an introduction, a paragraph explaining reasons, a paragraph describing research methods, and a concluding summary. The progression within each body paragraph is logical, and signposting such as “Firstly,” “Secondly,” “Another reason,” and “In addition” makes the relationships between points easy to follow. The examples are placed appropriately after the relevant methods. To make the cohesion more flexible and polished, avoid relying so heavily on list-like transitions and connect some ideas through explanation or reference. For example, the sentence about long-term residents could be linked more explicitly to the preceding point about speaking with neighbours. The final sentence also needs closing punctuation.
Lexical Resource: Band 6.0
Vocabulary is adequate for the topic, and the response uses relevant terms such as “property records,” “online archives,” “historical significance,” and “renovations.” These choices communicate the main ideas clearly, and there are attempts at more specific language. However, several spelling errors—such as “pervious,” “importanc,” “perserving,” and “offical”—and inaccurate forms such as “valueable” reduce precision. Some expressions are also less natural, including “learn about their home past” and “speak older neighbours.” Proofread carefully and build control of common collocations. More precise wording for the reasons and research sources would make the vocabulary more flexible and natural without changing the clear meaning.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.5
The response uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including subordinate clauses such as “where property records can provide information” and “as they may have valuable information.” Most sentences are understandable, and the range is sufficient to explain reasons and methods. Some grammatical and punctuation errors remain. For example, “people can speak older neighbours” is missing “to,” and “one effective method” should begin with a capital letter after the full stop. The phrase “For, instance” has incorrect punctuation, while the final sentence lacks a full stop. These errors do not generally obstruct meaning, but careful editing of prepositions, sentence boundaries, and punctuation would improve accuracy. Continue using complex structures while checking each sentence for completeness.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.