Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · Cambridge IELTS 16 · 2026-10-15

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In some countries, more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in.

What are the reasons for this?

How can people research this?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 4.5)

In some countries most of people are becoming intrested in finding out about the history or building they live in, the reason for this some people thinks that the history of house where they will start new life in the new house, to know its background about the house how last family lived there how they seatled the house. For example if I shift to knew house to live with family almost all people move to the new place for their family. I will investigate its old background like how many memebers lived there, from which city they belonged how many years they lived why they are changing the house and why they are moving to the new, how much cost for its renovation, I also investigate about the construction, for how much years the house constucted etc

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.0

You make a relevant attempt to explain why residents investigate a property’s past, mentioning curiosity about previous occupants and the house’s construction. However, the response addresses the task only minimally: the reasons are not clearly explained, and the second question—how people can research the history—is not answered with practical methods such as checking public records, speaking to former owners or neighbours, or consulting local archives. The personal example about moving with your family begins to support an idea, but it mainly lists questions you would ask rather than developing an explanation. The response is also 112 words below the required minimum, which leaves too little space to cover both parts adequately. Develop several relevant points and support them with specific examples.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.0

There is a basic connection between the topic and your personal example, but the ideas are not arranged coherently. The response is essentially one long sentence, moving from possible reasons to a hypothetical move and then to a list of questions, without clear paragraphing or a logical progression. The repeated use of “how” and “why” does not guide the reader through distinct points, and the relationship between wanting to know about previous residents and researching the building’s history is not made clear. To improve, use separate paragraphs for reasons and research methods, and organise each paragraph around one main idea. Linking phrases such as “One reason is…” and “To investigate this, people can…” would make the progression easier to follow.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some topic-related vocabulary, including “history,” “background,” “renovation,” and “construction,” so the reader can identify the general subject. However, the range is limited and several word choices or spellings make the message harder to understand, such as “seatled the house,” “knew house,” and “how much years.” Some phrases are also imprecise: “the history of house” does not clearly express the history of the building, while “old background” is not a natural collocation. Build a more accurate set of terms for this topic, including “previous occupants,” “property records,” and “local archives.” Check spelling and choose precise phrases so your ideas are communicated more clearly.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

The response shows an attempt to use longer structures, particularly in the opening explanation and the sentence beginning “For example if I shift…”. However, these structures are difficult to follow because clauses are joined without clear punctuation, and several grammatical patterns are inaccurate. For instance, “most of people are becoming” lacks an article, “some people thinks” has subject–verb disagreement, and “how many years the house constucted” does not form a complete grammatical question. The response relies heavily on a single extended sentence, so there is little evidence of controlled variety. Practise writing shorter, complete sentences first, then combine related ideas using accurate clauses and punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.