Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 16 · 2026-10-23
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
In some countries, more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in.
What are the reasons for this?
How can people research this?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
In the current societal landscape, a significant number of people are becoming keen towards investigating the history of their houses or buildings where they have been living. The key reasons for this could be their curiosity, cultural or architechtural significance of their homes. Hence, they can delve into finding the history through consulting their neighbors or from the government departments.
On the one hand, as far as i'm concerned, people are now becoming more and more interested in understanding the historical value of their homes. One particular reason is that they are more curious and wants to know roots or sense of belonging of the buildings they are currently living in. Moreover, I believe that many of the younger genertions are more interested in the cultural or architechtural value of the houses that they got in inheritence. For instance, numerous pupils often do research to keep an eye on the structural value of their homes, such as any damages or risk of future hazards in order to take all the precautionary measures in advance.
On the other hand, from my perspective, families could do the research work either through consulting their neighbors or through old records from previous newspapers. They can develop friendly relationships with their neighboring community and learn from them about the roots of the houses and about those who lived their in the past, such as any famous personality. Furthermore, people can also study the cultural and historical significance of that area from old newspapers, internet websites or by visiting the nearest government departments.
In conclusion, I believe that people should definitely learn about the history of their houses or buildings to become more and more familiar with the surroundings.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.0 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
You address both questions: curiosity and a desire for belonging are offered as reasons, while neighbours, newspapers, websites and government departments are suggested as research sources. These points are relevant, and the examples help make the response understandable. However, some ideas are not fully explained or are only loosely connected to the question. For example, the discussion of checking structural damage and future hazards concerns a building’s condition more than its history. The reasons could also be developed further by explaining why inherited homes or architectural interest prompt people to investigate their past. A more direct explanation of how each research method reveals historical information would make the response more complete and focused.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5
The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, separate paragraphs for reasons and research methods, and a conclusion. The progression from why people investigate to how they can do so is easy to follow, and signposts such as “On the one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “In conclusion” help orient the reader. This meets the lower-band expectations securely and shows some features of stronger organisation. However, the linking phrases are somewhat formulaic, and connections between individual ideas are not always precise. For instance, the example about structural risks does not clearly support the point about historical interest. Use more specific links to show how each example develops the paragraph’s main idea, and make references such as “their” and “that area” more explicit where needed.
Lexical Resource: Band 6.0
You use an adequate range of vocabulary for the topic, including “historical value,” “sense of belonging,” “cultural significance,” and “government departments.” These expressions help communicate the main ideas, and attempts at more formal language are evident. Some less common choices are inaccurate or unnatural, however: “keen towards investigating” would be more naturally expressed as “keen to investigate,” while “keep an eye on the structural value” does not clearly convey the intended meaning. There are also spelling errors, including “architechtural,” “genertions,” and “inheritence.” Such slips do not prevent understanding, but they limit precision. Aim for natural collocations and check spelling carefully, especially in repeated topic vocabulary.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0
You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including clauses introduced by “as far as” and “in order to,” and most sentences communicate their meaning clearly. Some grammatical errors remain. In “they are more curious and wants to know,” the verb should agree with the plural subject (“want”); “their roots” would also fit the intended meaning better than “roots” alone. The phrase “those who lived their in the past” contains a grammatical error in the location word (“there”), and “houses that they got in inheritence” has an awkward verb pattern. Capitalisation is also inconsistent in “i’m.” Review subject–verb agreement, pronoun reference, and sentence-level proofreading while continuing to use varied structures.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.