Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-08-24

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

A museum near your home is looking for people to do part-time voluntary/unpaid work. You would like to do some voluntary/unpaid work at the museum. Write a letter to the museum director to apply for the voluntary/unpaid work. In your letter

You do NOT need to write any addresses.

Begin your letter as follows:

Dear Sir or Madam,

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Dear Madam,

Hope you are doing well. I am writing this letter to request you for part time volunteer work in museum. I am doing the personal support worker course and I need to complete 350 hours for my college placements.

I am very good at leadership skills and communication skills. In the museum I can guide people and I can tell them about the religion also and connect them with the roots. I can also help people when ever they studied in the problem.

I have to complete 350 hours to complete my course and right now I am also doing my full time job and I am available on Fridays to Sundays. Can you please give me 7 or 8 hours voluntary in museum. I can come any time.

I look forward to hearing from you. Please let me know if you require any further information.

Yours sincerely

harsukhman Kaur

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.0
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.5
Overall6.0

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The letter addresses all three bullet points: the reason for volunteering, relevant skills, and availability. However, the development of these points is somewhat limited. For instance, the explanation of skills is quite brief, and the connection between the student's course and the museum's needs could be more clearly articulated. The tone is generally appropriate for a formal letter, though it lacks some of the professional polish expected in a formal application. The purpose of the letter is clear, but the content feels slightly repetitive regarding the 350-hour requirement.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The letter is organized into logical paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the progression of ideas. However, the use of cohesive devices is quite basic and sometimes mechanical. For example, the transition between the skills section and the availability section is abrupt. There is a reliance on simple sentence structures, and the flow between ideas could be improved by using a wider variety of linking words (e.g., 'furthermore', 'consequently', or 'in addition to'). Paragraphing is present but could be more effectively used to separate distinct topics.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary is adequate for the task but remains quite simple and repetitive. Phrases like 'very good at' and 'help people' are functional but lack the precision expected at higher bands. There are some minor issues with word choice, such as 'tell them about the religion' and 'studied in the problem', which are slightly unnatural. To improve, the student should aim for more specific terminology related to museum work or professional communication. The range of vocabulary is sufficient to convey the message, but it does not demonstrate a high level of flexibility or sophistication.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The response contains a mix of simple and some attempted complex sentences. There are several grammatical errors, such as 'request you for part time volunteer work' (should be 'apply for a part-time volunteer position') and 'whenever they studied in the problem' (which is unclear). Punctuation is generally functional, but there are errors in article usage and prepositional phrases. While the meaning is usually clear, the frequency of these errors prevents the writing from reaching a higher band. More attention to sentence structure and subject-verb agreement is needed.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.