Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 16 · 2026-11-13

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

How sugar is produced from sugar cane

cambridge ielts writing task 2 sample answers

Student answer (Band 6.0)

This diagram demonstrates the step by step production route of sugar from sugar cane.

Overall process includes 7 key steps starting from farming of sugar cane then taking juice from it. This Juice is then chemically processed and cooled to attain sugar from it.

First of all sugar cane is grown by the farmers for 1 to 1.5 years then it is harvested either manually or with an automatic harvesting machine. Next these sugar canes go through crushing process where juice is taken out of them using an crushing tool. This juice is then purified using limestone filtered, after that it went through evaporation process where it is converted into syrup. In the second last step this syrup is centrifuged which produce tiny crystals of sugar from it. And finally these crystals are dried and cooled using different techniques to get a sweet and fresh sugar grains ready for the use.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.5
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.5
Overall6.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

The response covers the main stages in the correct order, from growing and harvesting through crushing, purification, evaporation, centrifuging, and drying and cooling. The overview identifies the seven-step process and its broad transformation from cane to sugar, while details such as the 1–1.5-year growing period and the two harvesting methods are accurately reported. This gives the reader a clear account of the process. Some details are less precise: “using an crushing tool” does not clearly describe the crusher extracting juice, and “chemically processed” is not supported by the diagram, which shows limestone filtration and heating. The claim that the final sugar is “fresh” and ready for use is also an unsupported embellishment. More exact, neutral descriptions of the equipment and outputs would strengthen the report.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The information is arranged in a clear sequence, and the opening, overview, and process description give the response a coherent overall shape. Sequencing phrases such as “First of all,” “Next,” “after that,” “In the second last step,” and “finally” help the reader follow the stages. However, the process is presented largely as one long paragraph, and the repeated reliance on these explicit markers makes cohesion somewhat mechanical. Some links between stages could be made more smoothly, especially where the juice becomes syrup and then enters the centrifuge. Use separate paragraphs for the overview and detailed stages, and vary the linking by using clear references such as “the resulting juice” or “this syrup.” This would make progression more polished.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant process vocabulary, including “harvested,” “crushing,” “purified,” “evaporation,” “centrifuged,” and “crystals,” so the stages are generally understandable. There is also some attempt at more specific language, such as “limestone” and “syrup.” However, several choices are imprecise or unnatural for a process description: “chemically processed” mischaracterises the stages, “limestone filtered” is not the natural name for the equipment, and “sweet and fresh sugar grains” adds an unsupported quality and sounds informal. “An crushing tool” also reflects an inaccurate word form in context. Prefer precise terms from the diagram, such as “crusher,” “limestone filter,” and “sugar crystals,” and avoid decorative descriptions that do not convey observable information.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

The response includes both simple and more extended sentence forms, and the sequence is usually understandable. For example, the sentence beginning “First of all” links growing, harvesting, and crushing, while “where it is converted into syrup” adds a subordinate clause. However, some grammatical errors remain, including the article and noun phrase in “using an crushing tool,” the tense shift in “after that it went through evaporation” after present-tense descriptions, and the agreement error in “this syrup is centrifuged which produce tiny crystals.” The long final process sentence also relies on several clauses joined with “and,” making control less secure. Keep the present simple consistently for a general process, check subject–verb agreement, and divide longer sequences into shorter, accurately punctuated sentences.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.