Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 16 · 2026-07-26

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

How sugar is produced from sugar cane

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The figure illustrates the process of how sugar is produced from the sugar cane.

Overall, it is a linear process comprises of seven stages. Starting from the planting of sugar cane to cultivating and process continue and ends on the manufacturing of sugar.

In the first stages, sugar cane is planted in the land and it takes almost 12-18 months for growing . Once it is fully prepared it is cultivated with the help of harvester machine or it can be done manually. After being cultivation, it is collected and tied in the small bundles .

In the final stages, the collection of these small bundles are transported to the factory where they go through the machine for crushing and the liquid juice are produced . The Juice then sent to the limestone filter .The work of filter is to purify it and to separate the impurities. The filtered juice is subjected to heat so that it becomes syrup. This syrup is then centrifuged . In the centrifugation process, rotation occurs, and it separate sugar crystals from syrup. After drying and cooling , it is ready to use.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 7.0

The response covers all stages of the process, from planting to the final product. The overview is clear, identifying the linear nature of the process. However, the description of the stages could be more analytical. For instance, instead of just listing steps, you could group them more effectively into 'preparation/harvesting' and 'factory processing' to better highlight the main features. While the information is accurate, the transition between the agricultural phase and the industrial phase is slightly abrupt. Overall, the response addresses the requirements well, but could benefit from a more cohesive summary of the key stages rather than a step-by-step narration.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The response is logically organized, moving chronologically through the process. Paragraphing is used, though the second paragraph is quite long and could have been split to improve readability. Cohesive devices such as 'In the first stages', 'Once', and 'After being' are used, but some are slightly mechanical or grammatically awkward, such as 'After being cultivation'. The flow is generally clear, but the use of referencing could be more precise to avoid repetition of terms like 'small bundles' and 'juice'. Improving the variety of linking words would help the text flow more naturally.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.5

You demonstrate an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, using terms like 'cultivated', 'harvester', 'purify', and 'centrifuged'. However, there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as 'process comprises of' (should be 'comprises' or 'is comprised of') and 'After being cultivation' (should be 'After cultivation'). Some phrasing is slightly unnatural, such as 'the liquid juice are produced'. To reach a higher band, focus on using more precise terminology and ensuring that word forms are used correctly in context.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.5

The response uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. There are several grammatical errors that occur throughout the text, such as subject-verb agreement issues ('the liquid juice are produced', 'The work of filter is') and awkward phrasing ('process continues and ends on the manufacturing'). While these errors do not prevent the reader from understanding the process, they are frequent enough to impact the overall fluency. To improve, focus on consistent subject-verb agreement and refining the use of articles (e.g., 'the limestone filter' vs 'a limestone filter').

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.