Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 16 · 2026-09-24

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

How sugar is produced from sugar cane

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The given process diagram elucidates the mass manufacturing of sugar canes . The process joint venture humans and machines and work togather for a singal final product .

Overall , it can be seen that mass producation of sugar canes carried out by the following five distinctive steps. Additionally , the process starts from Growing (12-18 months) sugar canes and end at shipping the final products . Furthermore , all steps are very important and are connected with each other .

Talking about initial steps , the first step is growing (12-18 months ) , which is then followed by harvesting , then come Crushing , Purifying juice and Limestone filter , and then Evaporator ( juice becomes syrup ) and then extaction . All these processes complete almost half all the total of procdure .

Pouring some light on finalizing steps , these final step is very critical to get the finished product , final product is obtained by drying and cooling . Hence , a finished product obtained by following different phases the mass manufacturing the sugar canes and drying and cooling .

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

The candidate attempts to summarise the process of manufacturing sugar from sugar cane, achieving the minimum word count. However, the response falls short of fully satisfying the task requirements. While it mentions the general flow, the description of the specific stages is disjointed and imprecise. For instance, the writer groups several steps together vaguely ('then come Crushing, Purifying juice and Limestone filter, and then Evaporator') rather than outlining the linear sequence of the diagram clearly. Furthermore, the overview lacks precision regarding the actual number of steps shown in the process (the diagram depicts seven distinct stages). Important details, such as the two harvesting methods (manual and mechanical) or the centrifuge and drying phases, are either omitted or poorly explained. Consequently, the task is addressed only partially, warranting a band 5.0.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response is organised into paragraphs, but the overall progression and logical flow are weak. Although the writer attempts to use transitional phrases such as 'Overall', 'Additionally', and 'Talking about initial steps', the internal cohesion within sentences is frequently faulty or mechanical. Paragraphing is attempted, but the grouping of ideas is erratic, with sentences disjointed from one another. Referencing and cohesive devices are used inadequately or inaccurately, which disrupts the reading experience. For example, the phrase 'Pouring some light on finalizing steps , these final step is very critical' demonstrates poor cohesive control and mechanical linking. There is no clear, seamless overall progression guiding the reader logically through the sequential stages of the diagram.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The lexical range is limited and frequently impaired by word choice errors, incorrect collocations, and persistent spelling mistakes. The student attempts less common vocabulary, but these attempts often result in inaccurate usage. Examples include 'producation' instead of production, 'extaction' instead of extraction, and the awkward phrasing 'mass manufacturing of sugar canes'. There are also fundamental typos such as 'togather' and 'singal'. While the vocabulary is sufficient to convey a very basic idea of a manufacturing process, the numerous lexical inaccuracies and spelling errors restrict the score to a band 4.5, rounded to 5.0 based on the overall adequacy of basic terms.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

The student displays a limited range of grammatical structures, relying heavily on simple sentences and flawed attempts at complex constructions. There are frequent grammatical errors throughout the text, including subject-verb agreement issues ('these final step is very critical') and incorrect preposition use or word forms ('process joint venture humans and machines'). Punctuation is also problematic, with spaces incorrectly placed before commas and periods. Although simple sentences are occasionally controlled, the frequency of basic structural and grammatical errors causes noticeable difficulty for the reader and prevents the response from reaching a higher band.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.