Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 16 · 2026-10-01

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

How sugar is produced from sugar cane

cambridge ielts writing task 2 sample answers

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The provided diagram illustrates the making of sugar from sugar cane. There are 7 steps which are involved in the making of sugar.

Overall, from growing sugar canes to harvesting them, which undergo crushing and purifying their juice. Furthermore, the juice then go through evaporator, which becomes syrup and that sugar gets separate from syrup while going through centrifuge. At last, the sugar gets dried and cooled.

At first, the sugar canes take 12-18 months for growing and after that they get harvested by the farmer or by the machine. After harvested, these sugar canes crushed by the crushing machine through which juice is collected in a container.

Furthermore, the juice is purified by going through a limestone filter. The purified juice goes through an evaporator, where syrup is obtained from the juice. The syrup goes through centrifuge machine, where sugar crystals get separate from the syrup.

Finally, the sugar crystals obtained from centrifuge get dried out and cooled.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.5
Lexical Resource6.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.5
Overall6.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

The response successfully covers all seven steps of the sugar manufacturing process shown in the diagram, meeting the core requirements of Task 1. The overview paragraph attempts to summarise the main stages, noting the progression from growing and harvesting through to crushing, purifying, evaporating, centrifuging, and finally drying and cooling. However, some parts of the response are slightly under-developed or mechanically listed rather than fully synthesized. For example, the dual harvesting methods (manual versus mechanical) are mentioned but not fully integrated into the overview. The response demonstrates a clear understanding of the visual data, but to reach the next level, the overview should provide a more cohesive and synthesized summary of the entire linear process.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The text presents a coherent overall arrangement with a logical chronological progression from the beginning to the end of the manufacturing process. Paragraphing is used adequately, separating the introduction, overview, and individual process stages. However, cohesion is sometimes mechanical or relies on repetitive transitional phrases such as "Furthermore" and "After harvested". Referencing is generally clear, but the links between sentences could flow more smoothly. To achieve a higher band, the writer needs to employ a wider and more flexible range of cohesive devices and ensure that transitions between stages are integrated more naturally without over-relying on basic sequential markers.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

The student uses an adequate range of vocabulary suitable for describing a process, incorporating terms such as "manufacturing process", "crystals", "limestone filter", and "evaporator". There are attempts to use less common vocabulary relating to the diagram, but some word choices and word forms are inaccurate. For instance, the phrase "which undergo crushing and purifying their juice" contains grammatical and lexical awkwardness, and "these sugar canes crushed" misses a passive auxiliary verb. Spelling is generally accurate, but limitations in precision and collocation mean communication occasionally feels slightly restricted. Incorporating more precise verbs and varied nominalizations would elevate the lexical score.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

The response displays a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, demonstrating some control over basic structures. However, there are frequent grammatical errors, particularly regarding verb forms, voice, and missing prepositions. Examples include "the juice then go through evaporator" (subject-verb agreement and missing article), "After harvested" (fragment/omission of subject and auxiliary), and "sugar gets separate" (incorrect passive form instead of "separated"). While these errors rarely impede overall communication, their frequency prevents the writing from securing a higher band. Expanding the range of error-free complex structures and polishing grammatical accuracy are the key areas for improvement here.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.