Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 16 · 2026-10-03

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

How sugar is produced from sugar cane

cambridge ielts writing task 2 sample answers

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Now i will eleborate the process of how sugar is produced from sugar cane. The first step is growing, the sugar cane take almost 12 to 18 months to grow into proper height that is useful for production. After that they are harvest either using advanced machinery or cutting by hired labours. The crushing step occurs after harvesting and in this procedure sugar canes are crushed using crushing machine and juice is extracted.

Then the extracted juice is purified using limestone filter and all the undesired or unhealthy components are remove. In order to convert juice into syrup evaporater is used. In the step of evaportaion, the juice is placed in a evaporator and high heat is turned on that turned the liquid into vapors.

The centrifuge is employ to separate sugar crystals from syrup. In centrifuge the syrup is placed in centrifuge machine with is roattaed at high speed in order to separate crystals from syrup.

The resulting sugar crystals are dry and cool down in a proper container and as a result we have a sugar that can be used for daily routine purposes either for making tea or sweet dish.

This whole process of sugar production from sugar cane is highly cordinated and it ensure that a premium quality of sugar should be produced.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.5
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.5
Overall6.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

The response covers the main steps in the sugar manufacturing process from growing to cooling, but some stages are under-developed or lack precise details, such as omitting the mechanical versus manual harvesting methods clearly shown in the prompt. Additionally, the introduction includes unnecessary meta-language like "Now i will eleborate" rather than jumping straight into the summary. While the overall progression of the process is outlined, the reporting lacks the depth and extension required for a higher band, presenting a somewhat limited overview of the visual data.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The text demonstrates a coherent overall arrangement with a logical sequence following the stages of the diagram. Paragraphing is used to separate the different phases of production. However, cohesive devices are sometimes mechanical or basic, relying heavily on simple sequence markers like "Then" and "After that". Referencing is occasionally unclear, and the transition between sentences lacks the fluid progression seen at higher bands. The combination of basic linking words and adequate paragraph structuring places this aspect right in the middle range.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The vocabulary used is adequate for describing a simple industrial process, incorporating relevant terms such as "extraction", "limestone filter", "evaporator", and "centrifuge". However, there are noticeable spelling and word-choice errors, including "eleborate", "harvest" instead of harvested, "labours" instead of labourers, "evaportaion", "employ" instead of employed, "roattaed", and "cordinated". These inaccuracies, alongside occasional awkward phrasing like "daily routine purposes", limit the precision and flexibility of the lexical range.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

The writer attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but control over grammar is inconsistent. There are frequent errors in verb forms, subject-verb agreement, and articles, such as "the sugar cane take", "they are harvest", "juice is placed in a evaporator", and "we have a sugar". Punctuation is also weak, particularly with run-on phrasing and missing capitalisation (e.g., "i"). While the meaning of the process is generally communicated, the frequency of grammatical slips causes noticeable distraction for the reader.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.