Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 16 · 2026-10-13

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

How sugar is produced from sugar cane

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The process demonstatres the procedure of making sugar from a sugar cane.

Overall,a normal sugar cane plant takes a year and a half to grow.It usually have 2 ways to harvest , one manually while other with help of a harvesting mechine.After harvesting the sugar can , it is a complete chemical process to gain sugar from it.

Firstly, when sugar cane is ready to harvest , it is cutted down by a bare hands or by a mechenical instrument.Once it is harvested , it is ready to be squized in a crushing instrument , where its juice can be obtained.

once the juice is obtained , it is further sent to purificational process followed by evaporational procedure to convert juive into syrup.once converted into syrup, it is entered into a instrument which centrifugise the syrup to differentiate it from the sugar crystals formed in it. At last, the obtained matter is contained into a large container for mean of drying and cooling the sugar.The process of harvesting sugar can is absloutly much easier and simple then the complicated chemical process which follows it.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

The response covers the main stages in the correct general order, from growing and harvesting through crushing, purification, evaporation, centrifuging, and drying and cooling. It also includes the 12–18-month growing period and notes the two harvesting methods, so the key features are recognisable. However, some details are unclear or inaccurate: the cane is not described as being cut “by a bare hands,” and the final product is sugar rather than simply “the obtained matter” placed in a container. Calling the later stages a “complete chemical process” and contrasting them with harvesting as “much easier” adds an unsupported judgement. A more precise overview of the transformation from cane to juice, syrup, crystals, and finished sugar would make the summary more complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The information is arranged in a broadly logical sequence, and the use of “Firstly,” “Once,” “followed by,” and “At last” helps the reader follow the process. The opening overview also identifies the growing time and alternative harvesting methods. However, the response is presented as one continuous block, so the overview and stage-by-stage description are not clearly separated. Some links are mechanical or unclear, particularly “once the juice is obtained” and “once converted into syrup,” where the referent could be stated more explicitly. The final comparison about harvesting being easier than the later process interrupts the process description rather than providing a useful concluding summary. Clear paragraphing and more precise referencing would improve progression.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The response uses some relevant process vocabulary, including “crushing,” “juice,” “syrup,” “centrifugise,” “drying,” and “cooling,” which helps communicate the stages. However, spelling and word-choice errors are noticeable and sometimes make the description less clear: “demonstatres,” “mechine,” “squized,” “juive,” and “absloutly” are examples. Several expressions are also unnatural or imprecise, such as “purificational process,” “evaporational procedure,” and “differentiate it from the sugar crystals.” Use standard process terms and accurate collocations, for example “purification,” “evaporation,” and “separates sugar crystals from the remaining syrup.” This would make the vocabulary more reliable and precise.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

There is an attempt to combine stages using subordinate clauses and time expressions, as in “Once the juice is obtained, it is further sent…” and “once converted into syrup.” The overall meaning is usually recoverable, but some grammatical errors remain. Examples include “It usually have 2 ways” instead of “There are usually two ways,” “it is cutted down” instead of “it is cut,” and “the obtained matter is contained” where the sentence structure is awkward. Articles, agreement, and punctuation also need attention: “a sugar cane,” “a complete chemical process,” and missing spaces after full stops affect accuracy. Varying sentence patterns while checking verb forms, agreement, and sentence boundaries would improve control.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.