Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-09-01

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In the future, people may no longer be able to pay for things in shops using cash. All payments may have to be made by card or using phones. Do you think this will happen one day? Why do you think some people might not be happy to give up using cash?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

It is irrefuseable that technology have had a significant spike in this comtempory era and its impacts can be foreseen in upcoming future by either minimising or fully discouraging the use the paper bills whereas, online transactions not only provide conveinence but also helps the budget management . The both viewpoints will be articulated further alongside with supporting illustrastions.

Commencing with , the prior reason of shifting from cash to digital mode of payments is efficiency . To be more precise , through contactless payments people do a attain a record for their purchase further, helps them to bare the budget in mind . Moreover, this particular practice entails the consumers with a sence of security . A false transaction made online and be detected and reported at the bank at the same time , for instance . The fast and furious way to access the funds made the digital mode more reliable and trustworthy .

In contast , while few inhabitants argue that cash is irreplaceable to any other method owing to reason of its crucial value of circulation in market and ongoing practice passed down by generations . For example , a particular age group espacillly ; elderly generation , might find it as a cumbursome task to operate the funds online and also can become victim to scams . Ultimately , considering the paper currency to most safe and sound option on prime basis .

Overall , with the advancing settlement in future society as online payments outweights the benefits than the offline itself

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses both parts of the prompt: the likelihood of a cashless future and the reasons for resistance. However, the development is somewhat limited. The arguments regarding efficiency and security are clear but lack depth, and the counter-argument regarding the elderly is brief. The conclusion is incomplete, as it trails off without fully summarising the position or answering the prompt's final implications. To reach a higher band, you should expand on your examples and ensure your conclusion provides a definitive summary of your main points rather than an unfinished sentence.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is organised into paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. You use some cohesive devices like 'Commencing with', 'Moreover', and 'In contrast'. However, some transitions are awkward or misused, such as 'Commencing with ,' which has unnecessary punctuation. The flow between sentences is occasionally interrupted by grammatical errors, and the final paragraph is a sentence fragment that fails to provide a cohesive ending to the essay. Improving the variety and accuracy of your linking words will help your ideas progress more smoothly.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

You demonstrate an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, attempting some less common words like 'irrefuseable' (which is misspelled) and 'cumbursome'. There are several spelling errors throughout the text, such as 'comtempory', 'conveinence', 'illustrastions', 'espacillly', and 'cumbursome'. Additionally, some word choices are slightly unnatural, such as 'fast and furious' to describe digital payments, which is an idiom that does not fit the context of financial security. Focusing on accurate spelling and using vocabulary that fits the formal tone of an essay will improve your score.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede clarity. Examples include 'technology have had' (subject-verb agreement), 'the upcoming future' (article usage), and 'outweights the benefits than the offline itself' (incorrect comparative structure). Punctuation is also inconsistent, with spaces before commas. While the meaning is generally understandable, the high frequency of errors in basic grammar and sentence construction prevents the essay from reaching a higher band. You should proofread your work to correct subject-verb agreement and article usage.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.