Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-09-17

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In the future, people may no longer be able to pay for things in shops using cash. All payments may have to be made by card or using phones. Do you think this will happen one day? Why do you think some people might not be happy to give up using cash?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.0)

In this contemporary society, techonolgy is increasing day by day. Individauls are liking online payment instead of giving cash to the shopkeeper. I will discuss this notion in the following paragraphs with conclusion.

First and foremost, nowadays, techonolgy is upgarding all things. People like to use techonolgy, because they use smart work not hard work. Due to, technology and smartphones all people are love to use online money transfer instead of cash. since, it is more convinent to carry money. Secondly, they easily use cards rather than pay with cash. furthermore, sometimes they donot have change and coins and cash to pay. So they can easily use the online banking money to pay their bills. For instance, there is a lots of apps are avaiable which are providing cash backs, gift coupons, reedem vouchers etc. That is why, manu people are liking to use payment with cards not with bills.

Moreover, this things are starting from 4-5 years and it will continue in the future. Individuals love to pay with cards as well as they donot carry money. Because, they think pay with cards are easier to pay with cash. For example, today in this society, all shopkeers have card swipe machine. further, this was easy method to up to date with their money flow.

To be concluded, all things have their own benefits. If people may no longer be able to pay for goods in shops using cash. All payments may have to be made by card or using phones in the future. So, it will be efficient use of techonolgy.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.0
Coherence and Cohesion5.0
Lexical Resource5.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.0

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0

The response addresses the two main parts of the prompt: whether cash will disappear in the future and why some people might be reluctant to give it up. However, the development of ideas is limited and repetitive. For example, the writer mentions that 'it is more convinent to carry money' and that 'they easily use cards rather than pay with cash', but these points are under-developed and lack depth. The position is generally clear throughout, but the reasoning tends to generalise without providing strong, specific explanations or examples, relying instead on vague references like 'a lots of apps are avaiable'. This aligns closely with the Band 5 descriptors, where the task is addressed partially and ideas remain somewhat limited and under-developed.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0

The essay is divided into paragraphs, including an introduction and a conclusion, which provides a basic structural framework. However, the progression of ideas is often disjointed and lacks a clear overall flow. Cohesive devices are used awkwardly or repetitively, such as starting multiple sentences with 'Secondly', 'furthermore', or 'Moreover', and some transitions are confusing (e.g., 'Due to, technology and smartphones all people are love...'). Paragraphing is attempted, but internal cohesion within paragraphs is faulty, with sentences feeling tacked together rather than logically connected. This reflects the characteristics of Band 5, where there is some organization but inadequate, inaccurate, or repetitive use of cohesive devices and a lack of clear progression.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is generally basic and repetitive, with frequent misspellings and imprecise word choices throughout the text. Examples include 'techonolgy', 'Individauls', 'convinent', 'avaiable', 'reedem', 'manu', and 'shopkeers'. The writer attempts some less common vocabulary, such as 'contemporary society' and 'cash backs', but these attempts are undermined by persistent spelling errors and awkward phrasing like 'online banking money' or 'money flow'. While the meaning is mostly clear despite the errors, the lexical range is limited and minimally adequate for the task. This corresponds directly to Band 5, where noticeable errors in spelling and word choice occur regularly.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The essay relies heavily on simple sentence structures, and attempts at complex or compound sentences frequently contain grammatical errors. Examples of faulty structures include 'Due to, technology and smartphones all people are love to use...', 'since, it is more convinent', and 'they think pay with cards are easier'. Errors in verb forms, prepositions, and subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'this things are starting', 'all shopkeers have card swipe machine') are frequent and noticeable throughout the text. Although the reader can generally extract the intended meaning, the high frequency of grammatical mistakes and the limited range of accurate structures place this response firmly in the Band 5 category.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.