Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-07-28

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people think that it’s a good idea to socialise with work colleagues during evenings and weekends. Other people think it’s important to keep working life completely separate from social life.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

There is an ongoing debate when the topic is about to separate personal and professional life. It is frequently argued that the approach to get familiar with co-workers after working hours, whereas others contend that it is better to keep apart both the lives. Prior to my opinion, this essay will discuss both perspectives.

The major reason in a favor of get mingle with colleagues in leisure time at weekends will enhance their bond significantly. Employees can learn essential skills such as team building skills, organization skills, and communication skills. Moreover, Co-workers share their thoughts and ideas with fellow teammates to obtain constructive feedback. To cite an example, the well-known company in the technological market, Google, who often organizes weekend events for their staff and arranges couple of events in a year to build trust among workforce. Another crucial stance in support of socialize is sharing emotional bond, usually creates better understanding and reduces level of stress at workplace.

On the contrary, numerous organizations conduct strict working policy, which abundant employees to become friendly with each other. Focus of the company greatly relies on the hard work of labours. Logic behind firm's approach is to focus on work only; however, this ethical behaviour will improve productivity of an employee remarkably. Furthermore, this process will result positively for establishment as workers behave professionally with their close family members in the company, resulting in, great sense of professionalism.

By way of conclusion, although professionalism and overall productivity growing immensely with separating social and working life, by hanging out with colleagues, individuals would develop necessary skills in team activity will decrease negative attitude amongst co-workers.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The response addresses both sides of the argument and provides a personal opinion, fulfilling the task requirements. However, the development of ideas is somewhat uneven. The first body paragraph provides a clear example (Google), but the second body paragraph is less clear; the argument that strict policies improve productivity is presented, but the reasoning regarding 'labours' and 'ethical behaviour' is slightly confusing and lacks a concrete example. The position is clear, but the conclusion could be more explicitly linked to the personal opinion requested in the prompt. Overall, the ideas are relevant but could be expanded with more logical depth to reach a higher band.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay is organised into logical paragraphs, each with a clear central topic. Cohesive devices are used, such as 'Moreover', 'On the contrary', and 'Furthermore', which help guide the reader. However, some transitions are mechanical or slightly awkward, such as 'Prior to my opinion' in the introduction, which is not a standard phrase. Referencing is generally clear, though some sentences are slightly disjointed due to grammatical issues. The progression of ideas is evident, but the flow could be improved by using a wider variety of linking words and ensuring that the relationship between sentences is always smooth and logical.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.5

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, allowing the writer to convey their meaning. There are attempts to use topic-specific vocabulary like 'professionalism', 'productivity', and 'constructive feedback'. However, there are several instances of awkward word choice and collocation errors, such as 'get mingle' (should be 'mingling'), 'abundant employees' (likely meant 'prevent' or 'forbid'), and 'in a favor of' (should be 'in favor of'). These errors do not impede communication, but they do limit the precision of the writing. To improve, the student should focus on learning common collocations and ensuring word forms are used correctly in context.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. While the writer attempts complex sentences, there are frequent grammatical errors, particularly with verb forms and sentence construction. Examples include 'the topic is about to separate' (should be 'about separating'), 'the approach to get familiar' (should be 'the approach of getting familiar'), and 'productivity growing immensely' (should be 'productivity grows immensely'). Punctuation is generally functional, but there are some issues with comma usage. The errors are noticeable and occur throughout the text, although they rarely prevent the reader from understanding the intended meaning. Increased attention to subject-verb agreement and verb patterns is recommended.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.