Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-08-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people think that it’s a good idea to socialise with work colleagues during evenings and weekends. Other people think it’s important to keep working life completely separate from social life.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In contemporary society, contentious issues often sparks debate and Professional v/s social life has no exception. Some peaople opine that spending time with office employees is essential but other advocate that office life should be differentiate from the social life. In this essay we analyse both views before elucidating the final stance and delinate the personal opinion also.

There are enormouse facts that garner strength to the beleive that socialisation is essential with the office hours. Firstly, relation would be get strong between the employees as they learn the concept of coordination with open communication in relaxed environment.

Secondly, Workers relaxed their mind after spending hectic schedule in the organisation by which they start working, with fresh mind, in facile manner. Hence socialisation between the workers after working hours put posiitve effect on their personal as well as office life.

Shifting to thte other view, people who think that work life and social life should be different, because sometime secerecy get suffer as the employees share secret information about office that put negative effect on working life. For instance, some special promotions and demotions that are better for office environment but prior disclosing of such information may lead to negative effect in company. As a result people think working life remain within the office boundaries.

In my opinion, socialisation is essential in every feild of the society as it enhance the supportive behaviour via effective and open communication. However, some rules and principle must be followed by the workers while become socialise so that the professional secrets doesnot get effected.

To conclude, spending time with colleagues is essential as well as requirement of the workers not only to share their thought but also to get their bond stronger. Neverthelessness, this spending time doesnot harm the goodwill of company and proper principles must be followed.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The essay addresses all parts of the prompt, discussing both views and providing a clear personal opinion. The ideas are relevant, such as the benefits of coordination and the risks of disclosing sensitive information. However, the development of these ideas is somewhat limited. For instance, the argument regarding 'secrecy' is a good point but lacks a concrete, real-world example to fully illustrate the impact. The position is consistent throughout, but the explanation of the 'rules and principles' mentioned in the conclusion could have been integrated more effectively into the body paragraphs to strengthen the overall argument.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, each with a clear focus. There is a progression of ideas from the introduction to the conclusion. However, the use of cohesive devices is sometimes mechanical or slightly awkward, such as 'Shifting to thte other view' and 'Neverthelessness'. While the paragraphing is appropriate, the flow between sentences is occasionally interrupted by grammatical errors, which makes the transition of ideas feel less smooth. Referencing is generally clear, but the overall structure relies on a somewhat formulaic approach that could be improved with more varied linking phrases.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary is adequate for the task but shows limited range and some inaccuracies. There are several spelling errors (e.g., 'peaople', 'enormouse', 'beleive', 'posiitve', 'secerecy', 'feild') and word choice issues (e.g., 'garner strength to the beleive', 'facile manner'). While the student attempts to use topic-specific vocabulary like 'coordination', 'professional secrets', and 'goodwill', the frequent errors in spelling and collocation prevent the essay from reaching a higher band. The vocabulary is sufficient to convey the intended meaning, but it lacks the precision and flexibility required for a higher score.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors throughout. Examples include subject-verb agreement issues ('issues often sparks', 'secrecy get suffer'), incorrect verb forms ('relation would be get strong', 'workers relaxed their mind'), and punctuation/article errors. While these errors do not completely impede communication, they are persistent and occur in almost every sentence. The student attempts complex structures, but they are often faulty, which limits the overall accuracy. To improve, the student needs to focus on basic sentence construction and proofreading for common grammatical slips.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.