Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-08-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people think that it’s a good idea to socialise with work colleagues during evenings and weekends. Other people think it’s important to keep working life completely separate from social life.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

In recent years, the trend of meeting people especially in corporate world has been changed. Some people say that catching up with co-workers after work is a good idea for socializing and getting along with each other. However, some prefer keeping work life and personal life separate. This essay will discuss both the views with my opinion at the end.

Some people think that keeping personal life from professional life separate prevents interferences from their fellows. There are cases when they do not want to disclose everything. For example, the treatment they are undergoing through or any other personal concern. In addition, they believe that this can hinder their privacy. As socializing involves communication, there are times when they are supposed to answer a question which they do not want to. In these cases, they prefer detach themselves from gathering along with avoiding accompanying colleagues.

While others say that getting along together improves their bonding. This activity not only encourages stronger work relationships but also team collaboration among them. For example, many companys conduct fun activity sessions on weekends so that team members can connect more with each other apart from work. Other than that, these activities improve their understanding too. This gives them better chance to know each and build stronger working bonds. There are many organizations who send their workforce to a short trip either on a day off or on weekends to increase team collaboration. I also think that it is a good idea to connect with colleagues after work and know each other.

In conclusion, some say that meeting people from office affects their private life while others consider it as a better opportunity to connect with each other after hours. Moreover, I also completely support the latter statement as it benefits employees allowing them to share stronger bonds while working.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 7.0

The response addresses all parts of the prompt, discussing both views and providing a clear personal opinion. The ideas are relevant and generally well-supported, such as the mention of company-led team-building activities. However, the development of the argument regarding privacy could be more nuanced; for instance, the example of 'treatment they are undergoing' is a bit vague and could be better explained in a professional context. The position is consistent throughout, and the conclusion effectively summarizes the main points. To reach a higher band, ensure that the supporting examples are more fully elaborated to demonstrate a deeper exploration of the topic.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.0

The essay is logically organized with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Each paragraph has a central theme, and the progression of ideas is easy to follow. Cohesive devices such as 'However', 'In addition', and 'While others' are used effectively to link sentences and paragraphs. However, some transitions are slightly mechanical, and there is occasional repetition of phrasing (e.g., 'getting along together' and 'connect with each other'). The use of referencing is generally clear, though some sentences could be more tightly integrated to improve the overall flow and coherence.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The vocabulary is adequate for the task, allowing the writer to express their ideas clearly. There is an attempt to use less common items like 'interferences' and 'collaboration', though some word choices are slightly unnatural or imprecise, such as 'detach themselves from gathering along' or 'accompanying colleagues'. There are also minor spelling errors, such as 'companys' instead of 'companies'. While the range is sufficient to convey meaning, it lacks the precision and flexibility required for a higher band. Focusing on more natural collocations and refining word choice would significantly improve this score.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. While the meaning is always clear, there are frequent minor errors in grammar and punctuation. Examples include 'the trend... has been changed' (passive voice misuse), 'keeping personal life from professional life separate' (awkward phrasing), and 'There are many organizations who' (should be 'that' or 'which'). Despite these errors, they do not impede communication. To improve, the student should focus on subject-verb agreement, correct preposition usage, and ensuring that complex sentence structures are constructed with greater accuracy.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.