Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-09-17

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people think that it’s a good idea to socialise with work colleagues during evenings and weekends. Other people think it’s important to keep working life completely separate from social life.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In this modern era, every person do work to earn money and also to enhance their skills. Few masses argue that it is really beneficial to spend few time with their office colleagues in evening and weekends but other person thinkthat it is very cruticial to keep working life different from personel life. In my opinion, spending time with colleagues help them to enhance their skills but keeping personel life seprate help them to overcome workload.

However, giving leisure time to our colleagues not only help to learn new things but also enhance the productivity . To encapsulate, if person spend time with bachmates , they can easily solve any problem related to work by brainstorming. It will also help in growth of company and also in the promotion of their team. For Example, alots of big organizations make leisure rooms for their staff where they can spend time with their bachmates such as Google and many more.

One the other hand, keeping their work life seprate from work help them to spend more time with family.to explain, during the work hours it is hard to give time to family but in leasure time if we spend that with our teammates that will affect our bond with family and also with our kids .For example , we have plans for weekends to spend time with family. Secondly, every person need me time that they will spend with them , to enhance their skills,to work on their future goals. Find their interest in otherthings to feel relax to their brain and body.

To conclude, In my oppinion , spend time with colleagues on weekends helps to resolve any problem and for a bright future of organization but keeping work and personel life sperate not only help us to refresh our mind but also enhance our bond with family members.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses all parts of the task by discussing both views—socialising with colleagues versus keeping work and personal life separate—and presents a clear personal opinion throughout the essay. The student explores reasons such as enhancing work productivity and brainstorming for problem-solving on one side, and spending quality family time and personal relaxation on the other. However, the development of ideas is somewhat limited and repetitive in places. While examples are provided (such as Google having leisure rooms), they are brief and underdeveloped. The overall stance is maintained, aligning well with the Band 6 descriptor where all parts of the task are addressed, though some ideas remain under-developed.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay demonstrates a clear attempt at logical organisation, with distinct paragraphs addressing the introduction, the first view, the second view, and the conclusion. However, the cohesion within and between sentences is often faulty and mechanical. Phrases like 'One the other hand' contain typos, and referencing is occasionally unclear, such as pronoun shifts ('if person spend time... they'). Paragraphing is present, but internal cohesion can be repetitive and disjointed. Overall, the arrangement provides a coherent structure overall, but cohesive devices are sometimes inaccurate or awkward, placing this response firmly in the Band 6 descriptor range.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

The student uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, attempting some less common items such as 'brainstorming', 'productivity', and 'organization'. However, there are frequent spelling and word-choice errors throughout the text, including 'cruticial' instead of crucial, 'personel' instead of personal, 'seprate' instead of separate, 'bachmates' instead of batchmates/colleagues, and 'alots' instead of a lot of. While these errors do not completely impede communication, they noticeably restrict the precision of the argument, which reflects the characteristics of Band 5 lexical resource.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The writer attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, such as conditional structures ('if person spend time... they can easily solve...'). However, there are frequent grammatical errors, particularly regarding subject-verb agreement ('every person do work', 'other person think') and missing articles. Punctuation is also problematic in several sentences, with spacing errors around commas and periods. Although these errors rarely completely impede communication, they occur with high frequency and affect the readability of the text, fitting the Band 5 descriptor where frequent errors can cause some difficulty for the reader.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.