Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-09-24

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people think that it’s a good idea to socialise with work colleagues during evenings and weekends. Other people think it’s important to keep working life completely separate from social life.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Now there are predominetly two contrasting of thoughts about social life. One section assrets that working life should be totally different form socail life; however, others majority of section, including me, reckons that spending some time with co-workers in evening or weekend is better for socialzing with them. Both perceptions have their own importance which will be elaborted in the subsequent paragraphs.

To begin with, there are some reasons why it is beloived that being socialised with colleagues, is good idea. Initially, making strong relationship with teammates, it is necessary to communicate with each other in free time or weekend. To explain it, if workers do not talk with colleagues, they will be leg behind for learning many things from their seniour which putt adverse effects on thier career becuase without discuss their problems, how they can tackle issue that they are facing. For instance, it has been observed that people who do not have good bond with teammates, they cannot focus on their work as compare to others. Hence, communication with each other plays vital role for appropritate working environment.

On the flip side, those who think that it is essential to keep working life separate from socail gathering brings also some clarifications. To make it lucid, by foucing only on their work, individuals can pay more attantion towards their work instead of wasteing time for unnecessary talk. In this way, they can become expret in their field becuase they like to concentrate on their duties and responsibilities which teach them to become liable in future. For example, genious people always do their wokr alone without taking help from others and they do not like to involved any social events, so, it is very crousial to keep working life separate from social well being.

In conclusion, although, paying more attantion on work, helps to become successful im life, having conversation with colleagues is also plays vital role in good working ambiance.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

The response addresses all parts of the task by discussing both views—socialising with colleagues versus keeping work and social life completely separate—and provides a clear personal opinion in the introduction. The ideas are extended and supported, such as mentioning how communication helps workers learn from seniors and avoid career setbacks, and how isolation can lead to greater focus for others. However, there is a tendency to over-generalise in parts, such as the claim that 'genious people always do their wokr alone.' Overall, the task is well handled, and the student successfully presents a relevant, coherent position throughout the essay, meeting the requirements of a Band 6.5 to 7.0.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The essay displays a clear logical organisation and overall progression. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate the introduction, body paragraphs discussing opposing views, and the conclusion. Cohesive devices are employed to link ideas, such as 'To begin with,' 'On the flip side,' and 'In conclusion.' However, some cohesion is faulty or mechanical, and referencing is occasionally unclear, such as 'which putt adverse effects on thier career' and 'brings also some clarifications.' Furthermore, some sentences are awkwardly joined, leading to slight disruptions in the flow of reading. These features place the response firmly in Band 6.0.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The student attempts an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, incorporating terms like 'contrasting,' 'perceptions,' 'ambiance,' and 'responsibilities.' However, there are numerous noticeable spelling and word-choice errors throughout the text, including 'predominetly' instead of predominantly, 'assrets' instead of asserts, 'socail' instead of social, 'beloived' instead of believed, 'seniour' instead of senior, 'attantion' instead of attention, 'expret' instead of expert, 'genious' instead of genius, and 'crousial' instead of crucial. While these errors do not completely impede communication, their frequency prevents the score from reaching a higher band, making Band 5.5 an accurate reflection of the lexical control demonstrated.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The writer demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, attempting complex structures such as conditional and relative clauses (e.g., 'if workers do not talk with colleagues, they will be leg behind'). However, there are frequent grammatical errors, incorrect verb forms, and awkward syntactic constructions, such as 'they will be leg behind,' 'without discuss their problems, how they can tackle issue,' 'so, it is very crousial to keep working life separate from social well being,' and 'having conversation with colleagues is also plays.' These errors occasionally cause some difficulty for the reader and demonstrate that control over complex sentence structures is inconsistent, warranting a Band 5.0.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.