Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-10-08

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people think that it’s a good idea to socialise with work colleagues during evenings and weekends. Other people think it’s important to keep working life completely separate from social life.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Socialization and friendly meet ups among staff of an organization has a salutary effect on an individual is a view opined by a number of people. Whereas, the opponents beleive seperating peronsal life from the professional one is a better alternative. I have discussed views of both sides followed by my opinion in the upcoming paragraphs.

Taking into account the primary idea, team gatherings of a workplace in afterhours of the scheduled job caters to a compelling bond of understading, friendship and co-ordination among the members. Not only it builds a level of trust but also gives the staff to mix with each other at a personal level. To examplify, when colleagues of a common workplace go for a dinner, engage in intellectual conversations and enjoy playing a game or watch a movie together, knowingly or unknowingly they mutually share thier interests, goals, ideaology and beleifs. A substantial advantage of this is it ameliorates the individual's way of working as a team at the workplace proliferating the probability of acheiving employee recognition at times.

On top of this, in today's lifetyle, there is a burgeoning trend of loneliness and overthinking that stems from a lack of circle of friends. Consequently, when an individual who suffers from such issues on a daily basis, if gels up with the team mates of his office and stimulate his social lifestyle by leveraging his workplace group, can prevent a quagmire such as depression.

Considering views of the detractors, mixing up with the other employees of the office or jobsite often leads to conflicts among the colleagues where difference of opinions acts as a catalyst. For example, while having a debate on a specific topic in a restaurant with a colleague leading to further conflicts eventually gets reflected at work introducing jealousy and temptation to compete with each other rather than collaborating to generate results.

Subsequently, workplace politics is an epitome for this argument having pervasive and profound impact on the working environment including all the salaried employees and administration of the incorporation. As a result, keeping personal and professional life seperate enables an employee to experience peace, sustain for a longer term and prevent any unwanted arguments in the job.

In my opinion, hanging out with colleagues during weekends and establishment of strong relationships is of tantamount importance as drawing a line between the socialism and professionalism. What an indiviudal must prioritize, is the understanding and awareness of where to make efforts to make a bond of friendship and where to alleviate the efforts in a realationship with a colleague. Were it not for this balance, an individual can exacerbate his mental health, relations and stress levels at the job.

To sum up, both the views are equally legitimate and a balance of both can only sustain the well being of an employee at any organization.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You address both perspectives and give a clear preference for socialising, qualified by the need to maintain boundaries. The discussion of trust and teamwork is relevant, as is the counterargument that socialising can lead to conflict and workplace politics. Your examples of colleagues sharing interests and disagreements carrying over into work help support these points. However, some claims are asserted rather than explained: the link between socialising and preventing depression, for instance, needs careful qualification, and the detractors’ argument could be developed with a more specific explanation of how separation protects employees. Your conclusion says both views are legitimate, but could state more directly how your preferred balance should work in practice. This covers the task well, though development is uneven.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, your opinion, and a conclusion. Ideas generally progress logically, and examples are placed near the points they illustrate. You also use a range of linking expressions, including “Taking into account,” “Considering views of the detractors,” and “To sum up.” At times, however, these transitions feel formulaic, and some sentences contain several ideas that are difficult to follow. The long sentence beginning “For example, while having a debate…” obscures the sequence from disagreement to workplace tension. References such as “this” and “such issues” could also identify their meaning more precisely. Shorter, more focused sentences and clearer links between claims would make the progression smoother.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You show an adequate range and make purposeful attempts at less common vocabulary, including “salutary effect,” “burgeoning trend,” “pervasive,” and “ameliorates.” These choices demonstrate ambition, but several are inaccurate or unnatural in context: “a view opined by” is awkward, “cater to a compelling bond” does not fit the intended meaning, and “tantamount importance” is not the right expression. Spelling errors such as “beleive,” “seperating,” “thier,” and “acheiving” also reduce accuracy. Some phrases, including “stimulate his social lifestyle” and “sustain for a longer term,” are hard to interpret. Prefer precise, natural collocations over ornate wording, and proofread spelling and word forms.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex structures, including the contrast in “Not only it builds a level of trust but also…” and the conditional construction “Were it not for this balance…”. Some sentence patterns are controlled, but errors in agreement, clause structure, and punctuation remain. For example, “Socialization and friendly meet ups … has” uses a plural subject with a singular verb, while “when an individual … if gels up” combines incompatible clause structures. The opening “Whereas, the opponents…” is also an incomplete contrast clause, and several long sentences need clearer punctuation or restructuring. These issues do not usually prevent the reader from understanding the main argument, but they limit accuracy. Build complex sentences around one clear main clause and check subject–verb agreement.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.