Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-10-11
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people think that it’s a good idea to socialise with work colleagues during evenings and weekends. Other people think it’s important to keep working life completely separate from social life.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
Some individuals believe that socialise with colleagues in non-working hours are beneficial whereas others think totally opposite as they prioritise their personal life. I will discuss both points of view and share my own perspective.
On the one hand, people who like to go out with work friends are seen more productive at work as it helps them with understanding their colleagues that results into better communication between them and that should be advantageous outside of the work also, friends can explain in informal ways and that could give different views that helps one to understand problems caused at work and it could mitigates the risk of misunderstanding. For example, at work it's hard to speak openly with other works and crucial to maintain work in positive way that is why one could not be able to communicate informally at work as work has policies and procedures in place and often at work the time constraints are there, so one can be easily misunderstood. However, if workers have opportunities of hanging out with them that should help mainting the positive work environment and it could also helps business to grow because of reduced conflicts at work.
On the other hand, people who prefer gaps between workers with their personal family and friends, are also seen to be more successfull as they able to relax after busy work and if they go out with same people they worked that will drag the same toxicity which might affect their personal lives such as if managers are hanging out with their coworkers would potentially affect their decision making in the organization also, it has been considerabily seen of the rise of partially outcomes and discrimination impacts the decisions. Thus, work-life balance is significant for one who has toxic work environment.
According to my personal experience, I would say if you have career with high risks which involves vulnerablity such as security guards, or any defence services should maintain a distance from their colleagues as it can affect their personal life and that can ruin their career as well by taking personal grudges at work.
Overall, it has been seen as it totally rely on work nature and environment and it is subjective in nature. It should be the choice of individuals to choose whether they like to be in touch with their staff or stay separated after work.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
You address both views and give a personal position, so the response covers the main parts of the task. The first body paragraph explains how informal contact may improve communication and reduce misunderstandings; the second presents the value of separating work from personal life, including possible effects on managers’ decisions. Your conclusion appropriately says the choice depends on the nature of the work and environment. However, some points are less fully developed: the claim that socialising makes workers “more productive” is asserted rather than supported, and the example about security and defence work is not clearly connected to the earlier discussion of workplace relationships. Explain these links and develop your own position more consistently across the essay.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5
The essay has a clear overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, a personal example, and a conclusion. Signposting such as “On the one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “Overall” helps readers follow the discussion. This coherent arrangement is a strength. However, some sentences contain several ideas joined together, particularly in the first body paragraph, so the progression becomes difficult to track. The personal-experience paragraph also feels somewhat detached from the two main arguments. Use shorter sentences to separate claims and explanations, and add a clearer link showing how your example supports your position. References such as “that” and “it” are sometimes unclear, which weakens cohesion.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You use a range of vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “work-life balance,” “misunderstanding,” “decision making,” and “discrimination.” These choices help communicate the main ideas, and you attempt some less common expressions. However, noticeable word-choice, collocation, word-form, and spelling problems reduce precision. For example, “socialise with colleagues … are beneficial” is awkwardly formed, “same toxicity” is unclear in this context, and “partially outcomes” does not express the intended idea naturally. There are also spelling errors such as “successfull,” “mainting,” and “vulnerablity.” Aim for accurate, natural combinations of words and check spelling carefully; this will make your arguments easier to understand.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including clauses with “whereas,” “as,” and “if,” and the overall meaning is generally recoverable. However, complex sentences are often faulty, and errors in agreement, verb forms, articles, and sentence boundaries can make ideas difficult to follow. For instance, “people who like to go out … are seen more productive” has an incomplete comparison structure, while “it could mitigates” and “it could also helps” use incorrect verb forms after a modal. The opening sentence also lacks a grammatical structure after “believe.” Break up long sentences, check subject–verb agreement, and remember that modal verbs such as “could” are followed by the base form of the verb.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.