Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-10-13
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people think that it’s a good idea to socialise with work colleagues during evenings and weekends. Other people think it’s important to keep working life completely separate from social life.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
It is often argued that going out with work colleagues during evenings and weekends is a great way to relax, whereas others believe that office life should remain completely seperate from social life. Although, both perspectives have their merits, I believe that spending some quality time with office colleagues is a good idea. This essay will discuss both views and will explain why I support the former statement.
On the one hand, there are many reasons why some people think that socialising with work colleagues is a great idea. This primary reason is that it creates a strong bond between them. This is because when work mates hang out together, they become more close to each other, and share a beautiful bond of friendship. As a result, they work together as a team in the office without any rivalry, help each other in their task and keep the office environment friendly and non-toxic. Moreover, office colleagues spend most of their daily routine together, so it is always a great thought to socialise with them, because they become closer to eachother than the other friends who are far away. They understand eachother better because they face all the ups and downs of the work together. Therefore, hanging out with colleagues is the best way to relax. For instance, when we colleagues get exhausted from our daily hectic routine, we plan a dinner together after our office timings and spend some time together, discuss our seniors and laugh together, and enjoy our meal. Everyone feels relaxed and fresh to start the next day with full energy. We as friends, recharge eachother. Hence, it is evident that spending some quality time with colleagues is necessary. As far my opinion is concerned I completely agree to this statement.
On the other hand, there is a significant number of individuals who believe that work and social life should not be mixed. This is primarily because they think that by doing so their work life gets disturbed. Individuals spend more time in socialising and do not take work seriously. As a result, they can not perform efficiently. Consequently, their job comes iin danger, and they fear they might lose their job.
In conclusion, in my opinion socialising with work colleagues during evenings and weekends is a great way to share strong bond, relax and work together as friends. While there are valid arguements in favour of the statement that it is important to keep work and social life seperate as it can lead to lost focus on work. No doubt, balance should be kept between both lives.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.0 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
You address both views and state your position clearly: you support socialising with colleagues, while recognising the concern that it may distract people from work. The first viewpoint is developed with reasons about friendship, teamwork and relaxation, and the dinner example makes the argument more concrete. However, the opposing view receives much less explanation: it mainly says that socialising can reduce focus and put jobs at risk, without exploring when or how this might happen. Some points in the first section also repeat the idea that colleagues become closer. To strengthen the response, develop the case for separation with a specific example and explain how boundaries can protect privacy or prevent workplace tensions, while keeping your own position consistent throughout.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0
The response has a clear overall structure, with an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views and a conclusion. Signposting such as “On the one hand,” “On the other hand” and “In conclusion” helps readers follow the discussion. Within the first main paragraph, however, several sentences return to the same point about colleagues becoming close, so progression is less effective than the paragraph’s length suggests. Connectors such as “As a result,” “Therefore” and “Hence” are also used repeatedly and sometimes make the reasoning feel mechanical. The final paragraph introduces balance, but the relationship between that qualification and your strong support for socialising could be clearer. Group related reasons, reduce repeated transitions and use pronouns or linking phrases with clear references.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You use a range of relevant vocabulary, including “strong bond,” “rivalry,” “non-toxic,” “hectic routine” and “perform efficiently,” which helps communicate the main ideas. There are also attempts at more expressive phrasing, such as “recharge each other.” However, several word-choice and collocation problems reduce precision: “more close” is better expressed as “closer,” “a great thought” is unnatural in this context, and “job comes in danger” does not sound idiomatic. Spelling errors such as “seperate,” “eachother” and “arguements” also affect accuracy. Aim for natural, precise collocations and check spelling carefully; avoid repeating broad terms such as “great” and “strong” when a more specific description is available.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0
You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including subordinate clauses with “because” and result clauses beginning “As a result.” Most of the meaning remains clear, and the longer example is understandable. Some grammatical errors nevertheless recur. For example, “Although, both perspectives have their merits” has incorrect punctuation after the opening conjunction, while “they become more close to each other” has an incorrect comparative form. In “help each other in their task,” the singular noun does not agree with the plural meaning, and “As far my opinion is concerned” is missing a preposition. The conclusion also contains a sentence fragment beginning “While there are valid arguments.” Review comparative forms, agreement, prepositions and sentence boundaries, then proofread longer sentences for complete clauses.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.