Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-08-05

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The pictorial chart below illustrated the information regarding to the percentile of women and men of distinct age groups who engaged in regular exercise in Australia by the year of 2010.

Overall, it is evident that females ratio was almost high in each group as contrast to males besides of teenagers.

Initially, boys showed a little more interest than girls to doing fitness activity which accounted to 52.8% whereas girls classified as 47.7%. Womens demonstrated a slight rise to 48.9% who were in between the age of 25-34 at where mens decreased to 42.2%. Be comparable to middle age females which were the leading ones, adult womens little dipped to 52.5%. Before, the mens of 45-54 age went to 43.1%. It presented the percentage of physical activity as 39.5% in their adult age.

Subsequently, the womens interest in exercise were dramatically surged to 53% where the mens stayed at 45.1%. Moreover, with the passage of age female moderately dropped to 47.1%. Eventhough this was the stage where the mens were on the second priority list for exercise which constituted to 46.7%. At, where both the genders revealed almost a stable position.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

The response provides a summary of the main features, but the reporting is inconsistent and occasionally inaccurate. While you identify the general trend that women participate more in physical activity, the specific data points are sometimes confusingly presented. For example, the description of the 25-34 age group is unclear, and the reference to 'middle age females' and 'adult womens' lacks precision, making it difficult for the reader to map the text to the chart. To improve, ensure that you clearly label age categories as they appear on the chart and avoid vague descriptors. You have attempted to make comparisons, but the lack of clarity in data reporting limits the effectiveness of your summary.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5

The essay is organised into paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. However, the use of cohesive devices is often mechanical or misused, such as 'Initially', 'Before', and 'Subsequently', which do not always logically connect the data points. The flow between sentences is frequently interrupted by awkward phrasing, such as 'At, where both the genders revealed almost a stable position', which leaves the reader unsure of the intended meaning. To improve, focus on using transition words that accurately reflect the relationship between ideas, such as 'in contrast', 'furthermore', or 'conversely', and ensure each paragraph has a clear, unified focus.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary is somewhat limited and repetitive. You rely on basic terms like 'interest', 'activity', and 'percentage'. There are also several instances of word-choice errors and non-standard collocations, such as 'females ratio was almost high', 'womens interest... were dramatically surged', and 'constituted to'. These errors occasionally impede the clarity of your message. To reach a higher band, focus on using more precise academic vocabulary to describe trends, such as 'a significant increase', 'a marginal decline', or 'remained stable', and pay closer attention to subject-verb agreement and pluralisation (e.g., 'women' instead of 'womens').

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The response contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there is a high frequency of grammatical errors. Common issues include incorrect verb forms ('were dramatically surged'), missing articles, and awkward sentence construction ('as contrast to males besides of teenagers'). Punctuation is also inconsistent, particularly with the use of commas. While the meaning is generally understandable, these frequent errors require the reader to re-read parts of the text to grasp the intended meaning. Focusing on basic sentence construction and proofreading for subject-verb agreement will significantly improve your score.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.