Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-08-24

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The given bar diagram illustrates the percentage of Australian men and women in different age group who did regular physical activities in 2010.

Overall, it can be seen the age group of 45 to 54 females where more into regular physical activities in the year. And in male 15 to 24 age of people are more into activities. The people with age 65 or over got the similar number of men and women doing the regular exercises.

In the year 2010, female of 45 to 54 age number of people who were involved into the physical exercises was 53.3 percent, which was highest among all the age group of peoples. Similarly following the second highest was also by the female of 55 to 64 age with 53 percent.

Justlike, in compare of males with females, male are less involved into exercises in 2010 than the females. The most least age of people involve in regular physical activities by male are of 35 to 44 age.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.5
Coherence and Cohesion5.5
Lexical Resource5.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.5

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

The response covers the main features of the chart, such as identifying the highest participation rates for females and noting the similarity in the 65+ age group. However, the analysis is somewhat superficial and lacks a clear, data-driven comparison. For instance, the statement 'male are less involved' is a broad generalization that ignores the specific data points provided in the chart. While the key features are identified, the lack of precise data reporting for all groups and the somewhat disjointed presentation of the comparisons prevent a higher score. The overview is present but could be more effectively integrated to highlight the overall trends.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5

The essay is organized into paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. However, the use of cohesive devices is often mechanical or inaccurate, such as 'Justlike, in compare of males with females'. The progression of ideas is sometimes hindered by awkward phrasing and a lack of logical flow between sentences. While the paragraphing is sufficient, the internal cohesion within paragraphs is weak, making the text feel somewhat disjointed. More variety in linking words and better control over referencing would improve the clarity of the argument.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

The vocabulary is limited and repetitive, relying on basic terms like 'people', 'activities', and 'exercises'. There are several instances of awkward word choice and collocation errors, such as 'more into regular physical activities' and 'the most least age'. These errors occasionally make the meaning slightly unclear. To reach a higher band, the student needs to use a wider range of vocabulary, including more precise terminology related to data description (e.g., 'proportion', 'participation rate', 'trend') and avoid informal phrasing.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The response contains frequent grammatical errors, including subject-verb agreement issues ('male are less involved'), incorrect pluralization ('age group of peoples'), and awkward sentence structures. The range of structures is limited, consisting mostly of simple sentences. While the meaning is generally understandable, the high frequency of errors in basic grammar and punctuation is noticeable and impacts the overall quality of the writing. More attention to sentence construction and proofreading for basic errors is required.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.