Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-10-28

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The bar chart illustrates the comparison between Australian men and women who did regular physical activity in 2010 - categorised into six distict age groups.

Overall, female did more regular physical activity in all the age gourps than male except at the very young stage of life (15 to 24 years old).

In a age group of 15 to 24, male led the postion with a perentage of 52.8%, while it was 47.7% for female. Again regarding to the elderly (65 and above), the proportion of doing physical acitvity was slightly higher of female which was 47.1%, whereas 46.7% for men.

On the other hand, female ranked as superior in remaining all age groups. For 25 to 34 years old, 48.9% of women involved in physical exercise, while the fraction for men was 42.2%. Regarding 35 to 44 years old, 52.5% of total women were into physical activites, where the proportion of male was only 39.5%. Regarding two remaining age groups, women led the positon with a percentage of 53.3% for 45 to 54 yearls old and 53% for 55 to 64 yearls old, while the percentage of the male was 43.1% and 45.1%, respectively.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

The response selects the main comparison accurately: women recorded higher activity in every age group except 15–24, and the figures cited match the chart. It also reports the male low point at 35–44 and gives relevant comparisons across the remaining groups. The overview is clear, and the data are generally supported with specific percentages. To make the summary more fully developed, highlight the broader pattern more explicitly: men’s rate falls sharply after the youngest group and then rises, while women’s rate climbs to a peak at 45–54 before declining. The opening says the chart compares men and women “who did” activity, which is slightly imprecise because it shows percentages, but the response otherwise addresses the task well and stays grounded in the data.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The information is organised in a clear sequence: an introduction and overview are followed by the youngest and oldest groups, then the four middle groups. This makes the comparisons easy to follow, and linking phrases such as “Overall” and “On the other hand” help signal the structure. The final paragraph also groups related figures rather than listing them randomly. Some transitions, however, feel repetitive or mechanical: “Regarding” appears several times, and “Again regarding to the elderly” is awkwardly connected to the previous comparison. A more direct grouping of the age trends, with fewer repeated transition phrases and clearer references to the male and female rates, would make the progression smoother and cohesion more flexible.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

The response uses enough vocabulary to describe the chart and make comparisons, including “proportion,” “fraction,” “ranked,” and “percentage.” Meaning remains clear throughout, and there is some attempt to vary wording rather than repeat “rate” or “figure.” However, several spelling errors—such as “distict,” “gourps,” “perentage,” and “positon”—and inaccurate or unnatural choices limit precision. Phrases such as “female ranked as superior” and “were into physical activities” are not natural ways to describe chart data; “women recorded higher participation” and “were physically active” would be more appropriate. Aim for accurate, conventional collocations and proofread spelling, especially when using less familiar vocabulary.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

There is a useful mix of sentence forms, including comparisons with “while” and “whereas,” and most relationships between figures are understandable. The response also attempts longer sentences to combine both sexes’ data. Some grammatical errors remain, particularly with articles, agreement, and sentence construction. For example, “In a age group” should be “In the 15–24 age group,” while “female did” and “male led” use singular nouns where plural forms (“women” and “men”) are needed. In “the proportion … was slightly higher of female,” the comparative structure is faulty; use “was slightly higher for women.” These errors rarely obscure the intended meaning, but more consistent control of articles, plural forms, and comparison patterns would improve accuracy.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.