Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-11-07
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.5)
In todays world, sharing information plays a vital role in the scientific research, business and education purpose. Some people argue that the knowledge should be available freely to everyone while others argue that free access to sensitive information should be restricted. I contend that some information provide significant benefits but some knowledge should be protected for its misuse.
On the one hand, sharing information can bring significant advantages to the society. Primary, it can be useful in scientific research as scientist could use that information for new discoveries. This can lead to the advancement in medical and technology. Similarly, in academic world, students and teachers can share the knowledge which can provide benefit through books, research papers and widely educational sources. Moreover, it would be essential for business practices as the information regarding the products and services among businesses could be shared. For example, during Covid 19 many scientist around the world shared the researches and discoveries which result in early access to vaccines.
On the other hand, there are strong reasons why certain information should not be available freely. In business sector, secrecy of products and different business strategies which make their product different from other business. Competitors can easily copy the product of particular business which restrict the innovation and encourge businesses to invest more. Certain scientific knowledge should be kept hidden from the people as it could effect whole humanity. Sensitive personal data should not be available to anyone. Therefore appropriate restrictions are sometimes neccessary for individual or organizations.
In my view, Although there are huge advantages for sharing knowledge for society. General scienetific findings, research papers, education material should be available to everyone but the personal data that could risk the privacy should be protected.
In conclusion, although the free exchange of information encourages innovation, cooperation and education, certain types of knowledge are too valuable or sensitive to be shared without limitations. I believe that information should be shared whenever it benefits society, but reasonable restrictions are essential in situations where privacy, security or intellectual property is at risk.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 7.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 7.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.0 |
| Overall | 6.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0
You address both views and give a clear position: information that benefits society should generally be shared, while privacy and security risks justify limits. The discussion is relevant and supported with examples, particularly the international sharing of research during Covid-19 and the risk of competitors copying business products. These points help extend your argument rather than merely listing opinions. However, some claims are broad or only briefly explained. For instance, the point that certain scientific knowledge could affect “whole humanity” would be stronger with a specific example, and the business argument about secrecy could explain more clearly how protection supports innovation. Developing these ideas with more precise reasoning would make the response more consistently convincing.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0
The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, your own position, and a conclusion. The progression is easy to follow, and signposts such as “On the one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “In conclusion” make the argument’s direction clear. You also use examples in relevant places, especially the Covid-19 example in the first body paragraph. At times, however, connections between ideas are somewhat mechanical, and some sentences within a paragraph feel like a list rather than a developed chain of reasoning. For example, the move from academic sharing to business practices could be linked more explicitly. More varied referencing and clearer links between claims and explanations would make cohesion more flexible.
Lexical Resource: Band 6.0
You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “sensitive information,” “business strategies,” “innovation,” “privacy,” and “intellectual property.” These terms help communicate the main arguments, and the meaning remains clear despite some inaccurate choices and spelling slips. For example, “Primary” is not the right form for introducing your first point, and “effect” is used where a different verb is needed. Phrases such as “education purpose,” “widely educational sources,” and “the researches” are also unnatural or imprecise. Aim to learn common academic collocations as complete phrases, and check spelling carefully. More precise wording would help you express distinctions between public research, confidential data, and commercially valuable knowledge.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0
You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including subordinate clauses such as “while others argue…” and “which can provide benefit…”. Most sentences communicate the intended meaning, and the contrast between the two positions is generally clear. Some grammatical errors remain, however. In “some information provide significant benefits,” the subject and verb do not agree; “scientist could use” also needs a plural noun or an article. The sentence beginning “In business sector, secrecy…” is incomplete, and the final opinion sentence has an awkward clause structure after “Although.” There are also issues with articles and punctuation, including the comma after “Although” in that sentence. Review agreement, complete sentence construction, and punctuation around introductory clauses.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.