Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-11-08
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
People may differ among their ideologies depending on different demographic settings, but human nature have some features very common; for instance, love, hatred, anger and so on. Different psychology experts have different beliefs regarding the behavioural tendencies of different peoples but still they cannot deny that many of the basic natural behaviours show up some similarities.
The same way many people believe that it's similar tendency of every human being that anything they get for free, sooner loses value in their eyes. For instance, we as human beings know it very clearly that uncontrolled usage of water will result in the reduction of water in future, for our own races, but still we don't care because we, at present, have it abundantly. Therefore, keeping in eye the basic nature of people it is important to not share any valuable information with everyone and for free as well. When we share any most valuable information by charging some fee, it creates value and importance and people after paying money for getting that information do value it and utilise it carefully.
But, the other group of people believe that all the information should be available for everyone and for free; no matter one values it or not; the needy will get benefit from it even if it is for free. Let's say, if you start sharing videos on accounting; mamy of people will ignore those videos but the people related to that particular subject will obviously wath those videos seriously. Therefore we must understand that human naturally doesn't devalue the free available information rather they value what they need .
In my opinion, we must analyse the importance of information and along with that we must accept that if one has invested his time in learning something important then one has the right to charge some fees for sharing his expertise knowledge and experiences. Therefore, if government plays a role in making important information available publicly for free but by paying the fees to the provider, will result in more powerful positivity.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
You discuss both positions and give a personal view: you argue that valuable expertise may merit payment, while also recognising that free access can benefit people who need the information. The accounting-video example supports the access argument, and your final suggestion that government could pay providers offers a possible compromise. However, the discussion is only partly developed. The water example concerns conserving a physical resource, so its connection to sharing research or academic information needs clearer explanation. The claim that charging makes information more valued is also asserted rather than supported, and the final proposal is not fully explained. Develop examples directly related to research, business, or education and make your position more explicit throughout to strengthen the response further.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0
The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, paragraphs presenting the two views, and a concluding opinion. Transitions such as “Therefore,” “But,” and “In my opinion” help signal the direction of the argument. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes difficult to follow because several broad claims are placed together without clear links. For example, the opening discussion of human nature and psychology does not lead smoothly into the specific question of sharing information. Some connectors are repetitive or do not express the relationship precisely, and references such as “that information” can be vague. Organise each body paragraph around one clear reason, then explain and illustrate it in sequence, using more precise links between claims and examples.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You attempt a range of topic-related and abstract vocabulary, including “behavioural tendencies,” “valuable information,” “expertise,” and “publicly.” This gives you some ability to discuss the issue beyond very basic terms. However, word choice and collocation are often inaccurate or unnatural, which sometimes makes the argument harder to understand. Examples include “different demographic settings,” “for our own races,” “wath,” and “powerful positivity”; “expertise knowledge” is also an awkward combination. Spelling errors such as “mamy” and “wath” are noticeable. Aim for precise, natural phrases that fit the topic—for example, “different backgrounds,” “future generations,” and “valuable expertise”—and check spelling and word forms carefully.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
You use both simple statements and longer sentences with clauses, including “When we share any most valuable information by charging some fee…” and the conditional example beginning “if you start sharing videos…”. This shows an attempt to vary sentence structure. However, errors in agreement, articles, and sentence construction occur across the response and sometimes make meaning less clear. For instance, “human nature have” should use a singular verb, while “anything they get for free, sooner loses value” has an unclear subject and faulty construction. The final sentence beginning “Therefore, if government plays a role…” does not form a complete, well-controlled sentence. Practise building accurate complex sentences, checking subject–verb agreement and article use, and separating long ideas when their grammatical structure becomes difficult to control.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.