Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-11-08

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Information about scientific research, corporate and education is crucial but sensitive. Some believe that some knowledge about these areas should be confidential while others argue that people should be knowledgeable about these areas so that they can get benefit from it. In this essay, i will discuss both views and how I beleive that it should be shared.

Those who advocate that the information on these topics should be limited believe that it can be use for personal gains. The researches often provide enough data that can be used against the society. For instance, recent cyberattacks on Europe supermarkets is the perfect implimentation of this, hackers used science and caused finanacial loss to these businesses. In academics, releasing raw, unverified data can leads to error's and misinterperetation of data.

On the other hand, others, myself included argue for information sharing because it can motivate masses and can lead to positive changes in individuals life. Today's youth get ideas from discussion and data on these topics and they internalized those strategies. For instance, there is a podcast name "The Diary of a CEO" from which a lot of entreprenures are inspired in my country and they follow the advices of hosts that are from different fields like science, corporate, and education etc. Hence knowledge sharing as much as possible can change people perspectives.

In conclusion, although some people are against free knowledge sharing regarding science, companies, and education. However, I argued that this will benefit community despite of few setbacks.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You address both sides of the discussion and state your position in favour of sharing information, particularly in the introduction and conclusion. The examples of cyberattacks and the podcast help make your points relevant. However, the argument that information should be restricted is only briefly explained: the risk of data being used against society is asserted, but the example does not clearly show why limiting research information would prevent such attacks. The point about unverified academic data is also not developed. Your supporting case focuses mainly on inspiration and personal change, rather than explaining broader benefits of sharing in research, business, and education. The response is also one word below the required minimum. Develop each side more fully and connect examples directly to the claims.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. Signposting such as “On the other hand” and “In conclusion” makes the direction of the discussion easy to follow. Within paragraphs, however, some links between claims and examples are abrupt. For example, the move from cyberattacks to the risks of releasing unverified academic data introduces a second point without explaining how it relates to the first. The conclusion’s “although … However” construction also creates an awkward relationship between the contrast and your position. Use clearer topic sentences and explain how each example supports its paragraph’s main idea; vary linking expressions so they guide the argument rather than simply announce sections.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a relevant range of topic vocabulary, including “confidential,” “raw, unverified data,” “misinterpretation,” and “knowledge sharing.” These choices show an attempt to discuss the issue beyond basic everyday language. However, several spelling and word-choice errors reduce precision, such as “beleive,” “implimentation,” “finanacial,” and “entreprenures.” Some phrases are also unnatural or imprecise: “get benefit from it,” “a podcast name,” and “follow the advices” do not express the intended meaning idiomatically. Aim for accurate collocations and check spelling carefully. More precise terms for the risks and benefits of sharing would also help you explain the topic with greater flexibility.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex forms, including a relative clause in “a podcast … from which a lot of entrepreneurs are inspired” and a conditional-style explanation of how data might be misused. Meaning is generally understandable, but errors in verb forms, agreement, articles, and sentence construction remain noticeable. Examples include “it can be use,” “data … can leads,” and “a podcast name.” The opening sentence fragment in the conclusion, “although some people are against …,” is followed by “However,” leaving the contrast structure incomplete. There are also inconsistent capitalisation and punctuation choices. Practise building accurate complex sentences, especially with modal verbs and subordinate clauses, and proofread each sentence for a complete grammatical structure.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.