Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-11-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

It is often argued by the people that it is good to share all the latest updates in different field of life such as in scientific research, work place and other academic world since it provides more knowledge whereas people in some countries argue they should share only essential information. This is because they believe that some information are fake nowadays. I believe that they should share all information because it gives latest information and knowledge.

People in some countries believe that we should not share any news if they are not particular. This is because some information are unnecessary and they are not beneficial for many fields of life. Take the example of Germany: a well-developed country where it was seen that people were sharing only important news among themselves and protecting each other from fake news. Hence, it plays a crucial role.

On the other hand, some individuals believe that sharing all the information is extremely beneficial because it provides knowledge and good for the economic of a country. For instance, a survey was conducted in New York, it was seen there fifty percent of people was sharing information of schools and universities research among their children to aware them about the world.

I believe that we should share all the information because they are source of latest information and provide knowledge.

To sum up, even though some people disagree from this notion and they have drawbacks, I believe it to be extremely beneficial not only because they are a source of latest information but also they are contributing in country development.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You present a clear opinion in the introduction and conclusion: you support sharing information because it provides knowledge. You also attempt to discuss both views, using examples about Germany and a survey in New York. However, the discussion is only partial and the ideas remain limited or under-developed. The opposing view is mainly explained as concern about unnecessary or fake information, rather than addressing why research, business, or academic information might be valuable or sensitive. Your examples are asserted but not clearly connected to the specific fields in the question; for instance, the New York example about sharing school research among children does not explain the economic benefit you claim. Develop each side with a reasoned explanation and a more relevant, specific example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. Basic signposting such as “On the other hand” and “To sum up” helps readers follow the broad direction. However, progression within paragraphs is limited: claims are often followed by examples that do not clearly support them, and the conclusion repeats the same general point rather than drawing the discussion together. Some linking is mechanical or unclear, as in “Hence, it plays a crucial role,” where “it” has no precise reference. Improve cohesion by making each paragraph develop one central claim, using clear references, and explaining how each example supports that claim.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate the general subject, including “scientific research,” “fake news,” “economic,” and “academic world.” However, the range is limited and several expressions are repetitive or imprecise, particularly repeated uses of “information,” “share,” and “good.” Some word choices and collocations make meaning less natural, such as “good for the economic of a country,” “not particular,” and “to aware them.” Aim for more precise language that distinguishes between sharing research findings, protecting valuable information, and checking reliability. Vary repeated terms where appropriate, but prioritise accurate collocations over using more complex vocabulary.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and complex sentences, including clauses with “because” and “whereas,” and the overall meaning is usually understandable. However, the range is limited, and errors occur frequently in agreement, articles, verb forms, and sentence construction. Examples include “some information are fake,” “fifty percent of people was sharing,” and “a survey was conducted in New York, it was seen there,” which joins ideas awkwardly. There are also problems with plural and singular reference, as in “they are source.” Practise building accurate sentences around one main clause, then add subordinate clauses carefully. Check subject–verb agreement and whether nouns are countable before submitting.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.