Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-11-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Yes it is true that some people believe that sharing is caring but on the opposite side,some people think that it is not ecessary to share all the information to others.

First talk about generaous people who think that if we share some knowledge of academic difficulty with others than it would be very helpful.Like if a fellow student is having trouble in understanding a complex phenomena than it is our duty to help him in this.Likewise,if some scientists are doing research on particular project than it would be fruitful if they work as a team.Beacuse when different minds combine their ability for scientific research than it would produce effecient outcome.

Second group believe that, it is not necessary to share every single information to others.For example if a group of people working on something secret and confidential for the country than a little mistake would result in big disaster.Same rule apply in buisness, if your compitetor know about sensitive information of your company product than it would be a bad move for your buisness.

According to my opinion,some information can be shared like academic beacuse it would help your fellow colleagues to perform better in their exam.But in buisness everone is your competitor so you have to be very careful in sharing information.If you want to be successful in buisness than you should try to to keep every bit of information to yourself.In short, one should not be so rude im sharing even a simple question but on the other hand not so kind that your owm kindness result in your faliure.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You discuss both perspectives and give a personal view, so the response addresses the main parts of the prompt. The examples about students helping one another, scientists collaborating, confidential national work, and business competitors are relevant. However, the ideas are mostly asserted rather than explained: for instance, you say teamwork produces an “efficient outcome” but do not show how sharing improves research or give a specific example. Your position also shifts: you support sharing academic knowledge, yet conclude that people should keep “every bit of information” to themselves in business, without clarifying what kinds of business information should remain private. Develop each argument with a reason or example and make your overall position more consistent.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, one paragraph for each view, and a concluding opinion. This helps the reader follow the broad discussion. However, progression within paragraphs is limited, and the repeated sequence “First” and “Second” makes the organisation feel mechanical. Some links between ideas are unclear, such as moving from helping a fellow student to scientists working as a team without explaining the connection. The conclusion also introduces a broad claim about keeping business information private that is not fully reconciled with the earlier discussion. Use clearer topic sentences, connect examples explicitly to the point they support, and use referencing and transitions more naturally.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate the main ideas, including “scientific research,” “confidential,” “sensitive information,” and “competitor.” However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate or repetitive, which sometimes makes the message less clear. For example, “academic difficulty” does not naturally express the idea of academic knowledge, and “share every single information” is an awkward phrase. Spelling errors such as “effecient,” “buisness,” and “faliure” are also noticeable. Build a more precise vocabulary for discussing openness, confidentiality, and commercial advantage, and check spelling and common word combinations carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt some complex sentences, including conditional structures such as “if a group of people [is] working on something secret … a little mistake would result in big disaster.” However, the range is limited, and errors occur frequently in sentence construction, agreement, articles, and punctuation. Examples include “if we share … than it would be,” “some scientists are doing research … than it would be,” and “Same rule apply.” Several sentences also run together after commas, making relationships between clauses harder to follow. Practise building accurate simple sentences first, then add subordinate clauses with correct verb forms and punctuation. Proofreading for sentence boundaries and agreement would improve clarity.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.