Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

some individuals critcise that it is beneficial to communicate as much information as possible in scientific reseasrch ,business management and academic institutes . Few people argue that some information is to confindentail and significant to be shared with everyone.In any feild we need to convey some information with collegues and other members for research and for many other puposes .in my opinion sharing information is beneficial as well as has same drawbacks to be considered.

one the one hand sharing information boost our project performance and we can easily windup it.sharing information helps to create coordination and trust with team members.moreover,communicating such important informtaion helps to find out new ideas by discussing with other members.

one the other hand crtics argue that it is very confidential and important information so, cannot be shared with everyone.There is huge risk of misuse it.for example if someone is working on any scientfic research this develpment will also have some negative effects like drugs .some bad peeople can misuse it easily.in the same way a writer is writing a book it can be stolen easily and someone can publish it with his own name .in addition same scenario can be apply one any business project their secrete business deal can be leaked and leads to major negative consquenses.

in conclusion, sharing information is benficial in many aspects like ,trust buliding,team work,enhance workforce but also has many disadvantages that can contriubute to major loss for business,human beings and public health.a balance approach will work best for this scenario.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You discuss both positions: sharing can improve teamwork and generate ideas, while unrestricted access may lead to misuse, plagiarism, or leaked business information. Your conclusion also gives a preference for a “balance approach,” so a position is present. However, the discussion remains limited and some points are not fully explained. For instance, the scientific-research example mentions drugs and possible negative effects but does not clarify how sharing creates the risk or provide a specific illustration. The benefits are also asserted rather than supported with a developed example. Make your opinion more explicit in the introduction and explain each main point with a clear reason and a relevant example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. This helps readers identify the main stages of the discussion. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes unclear, and several ideas are joined mechanically. Repeated transitions such as “one the one hand,” “one the other hand,” and “in addition” do not always show the precise relationship between points. The sentence about scientific research, drugs, and misuse is difficult to follow, while the conclusion lists benefits and harms without clearly synthesising the discussion. Use topic sentences, connect each example directly to its claim, and check that pronouns and references clearly identify what they refer to.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “coordination,” “trust,” “confidential,” “misuse,” and “business deal.” These choices show an attempt to discuss both collaboration and the risks of disclosure. However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate, which can make meaning harder to follow: “windup it,” “boost our project performance,” and “negative consequences” are not consistently expressed naturally. Spelling errors such as “reseasrch,” “confindentail,” and “consquenses” are also noticeable. Build a more precise set of topic vocabulary and check spelling and collocations; for example, distinguish between sharing research findings, protecting intellectual property, and disclosing confidential information.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple statements and longer sentences, including a conditional idea in “if someone is working on any scientific research.” However, the range is limited, and errors in sentence construction, agreement, articles, and punctuation occur frequently enough to make some sentences difficult to read. For example, “sharing information boost our project performance” has a subject–verb agreement error, while “There is huge risk of misuse it” has an incomplete grammatical pattern. Several sentences run together without clear punctuation, particularly the examples about research and business. Practise building accurate simple sentences first, then combine them using clauses such as “because,” “which,” and “although.” Check agreement, articles, and sentence boundaries during revision.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.