Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Many individuals agree that it is positive to distribute as much information as possible in Scientific study, business and the academic world. Other people believe that certain information are very essential or extremely valuable to be diseminated freely. Most people are optimistic that sharing information about essential topics like science, academia and business can be beneficial to the society. This is because it will broaden the knowledge of individuals in these sectors. However, others believe that some data from these areas are very crucial and should not be accesible to everyone, which is because information about these topics can be easily twisted into wrong perspectives.

Sharing information about important topics like these three topics can significantly improve the knowledge of people. For example, if a scientific research is done on the popular Ebola virus, the data gathered from the research should be diseminated to the people that are affected by the virus, especially if the information is positive. It will give hope to people, and encourage them to stay positive. Business data can also help traders in sales their sales increasement.

Contrastly, information from these topics can also be extremely sensitive. Therefore, they should be treated with atmost care. Many people believe that it can be detrimental to share certain data relating to academic world, business and science. This is because their data can be easily misinterpreted into something completely different. For instance, a scientific research might discuss that Corona vaccines will take more than one year to be released, while some peole might be spreading rumors that there will be no vaccine for the said disease.

In conclusion, my opinion is that researchers in every field are accountable to the people. They are obligated to pass all their research findings to the people. This can bring more clarity, and precent more problems in the future.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You discuss both views and state a clear position in the conclusion: researchers should share their findings with the public. The Ebola example supports the benefits of sharing, while the vaccine-rumour example illustrates how information can be misinterpreted. However, the discussion is uneven and some points are not fully explained. The claim that research data will “give hope” is not clearly linked to the value of open access, and the business point about helping traders increase sales is brief and unclear. Your position also needs more qualification: the opposing view concerns information that may be too valuable or sensitive to share freely, but the conclusion says researchers should pass “all” findings to the public. Explain what should be shared, with whom, and under what safeguards.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a coherent overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. Linking expressions such as “However,” “For example,” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the main stages. Some connections are less clear or mechanical, though. The opening repeats the topic’s list of fields, and “these three topics” is an imprecise reference to science, business, and academia. The sentence about business data appears abruptly after the Ebola example, without explaining how it supports the paragraph’s point. Improve progression by giving each body paragraph a clear central claim, then developing its examples and explanation in sequence; use pronouns and references only when their meaning is unmistakable.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic-related vocabulary, including “research findings,” “sensitive,” “misinterpreted,” and “detrimental,” and the meaning is generally clear. There are also attempts at less common or formal wording, but some choices and spellings are inaccurate: “diseminated” and “accesible” are misspelled, “atmost care” is incorrect, and “sales increasement” is an unnatural expression. “Scientific study” is capitalised unnecessarily, while “data” is used repeatedly and sometimes vaguely. These issues do not prevent understanding, but they limit precision and naturalness. Build accuracy by checking spelling and collocations, and choose specific terms such as “research data,” “commercially sensitive information,” or “increase sales” where appropriate.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including clauses with “because,” “while,” and “if,” and most sentences communicate their main meaning. Some grammatical errors remain. For example, “certain information are” has a subject–verb agreement problem, and “a scientific research” uses an unsuitable article with an uncountable noun. In “help traders in sales their sales increasement,” the sentence pattern is faulty, making the meaning difficult to follow. There are also awkward constructions such as “their data can be easily misinterpreted into something completely different.” Review agreement, articles, and verb patterns, and read each sentence to check that its clauses connect grammatically. More consistently controlled complex sentences would strengthen the response.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.