Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

the issue of sharing information its related of scientific,business and the academic ,is one that devides opinion ,while some people believe that it possible to share papars or research among the people working or have interasting in these fileds ,other agrue that that any andividuals have right to access all the data without any restrictions . this essay will examine both perspectives .before i explain whay i find access to whole articals or paper that adrass many topics freely more convincing .

on the one hand, it is crusial to make information available for all categories ,whather who has certificate or not received education acadymic or not this considerd as right .furthermore, pepole are have accssesible to download or read or browse articals were puplished in several websites or platformes ,for make pepole acheive progress and devlopment both intellectuelle and cognitive this approach have a positive outcome de n the mental health.for instance , people hace become much more growing and mature and it helps to broden knowledge and extending their informations they prowser form this articels in multytopics sports,art,politics,this way can build community have moral and informad in several topics

on the other hand,there is a contradict opinion Ho think thay date should be share just among people have academyc or sientific background not for general puplic because they consider which its a privileges and no one can access to this valuabale informations.moreover,the informations when become available any person world wide it could loss their value and advantages they have

in conclude,there lot of people think the academyc informations have to conservation and in my opinin that decrease s unfair and unmorale because a many people can not payment or reach to informations easier

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You address both sides of the debate and give a personal view, particularly in the introduction and conclusion. The first body paragraph explains that open access can broaden knowledge and support intellectual development, while the second presents the concern that information may lose value if widely available. However, the discussion does not fully match the task’s focus on scientific research, business and academia: much of the support shifts to general access to articles and public knowledge. The argument for restricting information is especially brief and its reasons are not clearly explained. Your position—that restricting access is unfair—is present, but it would be more convincing if supported with a specific example and a clearer explanation of when information should or should not be shared.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, two paragraphs presenting opposing views, and a conclusion. The signposts “on the one hand” and “on the other hand” help readers identify the contrast, and the example about articles covering sports, art and politics supports the first view. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes difficult to follow because several points are joined together without clear relationships. For example, the first body paragraph moves from educational access to mental health and then to community knowledge without explaining the links. The second view and conclusion are very short, so the discussion feels unbalanced. Use clearer topic sentences, develop one main idea at a time, and make references such as “this approach” and “they” unambiguous.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You attempt vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “available,” “access,” “privileges,” “valuable information,” and “progress and development.” These choices show an effort to discuss access and its consequences. However, the range is limited and many spelling errors or inaccurate word forms make the message harder to understand, as in “devides,” “interasting,” “puplished,” and “informations.” Some phrases are also unnatural or imprecise, such as “people are have accessible” and “this way can build community have moral.” Aim to use accurate topic-specific expressions and check spelling and collocations carefully. Repeating “information” and “people” also limits variety; alternatives such as “research findings,” “the public,” and “academic resources” would help convey your ideas more precisely.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt to connect ideas in longer sentences, using forms such as “while,” “because,” and “when,” and you include both simple statements and more complex clauses. However, complex sentences are often faulty, and frequent errors in sentence structure, agreement, articles and verb forms can make meaning difficult to follow. For example, “people are have accessible to download” combines incompatible verb forms, while “this approach have a positive outcome” has an agreement error. The opening sentence also lacks a clear grammatical structure, and punctuation is inconsistent, with missing spaces after commas and sentence boundaries. Practise building accurate short sentences first, then combine them with one subordinate clause. Check subject–verb agreement and ensure each sentence has a complete, clearly organised main clause.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.