Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Certain people consider that it is beneficial to desseminate much knowledge of scientific research, business and educational sector, however some suggests that only specific information that is important and relevant should be shared.The views of both supporters and opponents are valid to some extent because too little information make the concepts difficult to understand while excessive available data create confusion to select the more impportant one.

I agree with the notion that it is good to share a detailed perspective of authors while they are sharing some evidence-based knowledge ,business trend or educational informations.This approache provide a n oppertunity of wider understanding of the given information.For instance, if a researcher publishes a research article based on some experiment, should share all the related information of all aspects of his research such as targeted population, study design, site and setting, sample size instead of only sharing the facts and figures showing results.This may hinder the complete understanding of the finding that can lead to wrong implication.

However, on the other hand, I also believe that a lot of information make it difficult to grasp the main concept of the provide material despite spending alot of time and energy.The main factor that could be the availability of a lot of choices and a mixture of important and unimportant information.For example a student struggling to prepare for exams will get confused after seeing allot of educational material. Consequently, it will create uncertainity and frustration for the reader.

In conclusion, both approaches are valid and usefull, however, it depends on the requirements and immediate need of the reader from which he can benefit more.Advantages of both stretegies are considerable and important.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both views and give a personal position: you support sharing detailed research information while recognising that too much material can overwhelm readers. The research example—listing the population, design, setting and sample size—helps explain why transparency matters, and the student-exam example illustrates the opposing concern. However, the discussion is not equally developed: the second view is explained mainly as a problem of volume and choice, without considering why information might be valuable, sensitive or commercially important. Your conclusion says the best approach depends on readers’ needs, but this qualification is not fully reconciled with your earlier support for detailed sharing. Develop the reasons behind each view and state more precisely when information should or should not be shared.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. The progression from the benefits of sharing research details to the difficulty of processing excessive material is easy to follow, and examples are placed with the relevant points. You also use signposting such as “For instance,” “However,” and “In conclusion.” At times, though, these links feel mechanical or repetitive, particularly “However, on the other hand,” and some sentences contain several ideas without clear internal connections. The conclusion also introduces a conditional position that could be linked more explicitly to the arguments above. Use fewer paired transition phrases and make the relationship between each claim, explanation and example more explicit.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You attempt vocabulary suited to the topic, including “evidence-based knowledge,” “study design,” “targeted population,” and “uncertainty and frustration.” These choices help convey the subject matter, and the reader can generally understand your meaning. However, spelling and word-choice errors are noticeable, including “desseminate,” “impportant,” “oppertunity,” and “stretegies.” Some expressions are also unnatural or imprecise, such as “educational informations,” “a detailed perspective of authors,” and “wrong implication.” These issues limit the precision and naturalness of the vocabulary, even when the intended point is clear. Check spelling carefully, avoid uncountable-noun errors in word choice, and learn common academic collocations—for example, “share research findings” and “draw incorrect conclusions.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You use a mixture of simple and complex sentence forms, including a reason clause (“because too little information…”) and conditional structures (“if a researcher publishes…”). This gives the response some variety, and the main ideas remain understandable. Some grammatical errors persist, however. For example, “some suggests” has a subject–verb agreement problem, while “too little information make” also needs agreement. In “This approache provide a n oppertunity,” the verb does not agree with its subject, and the article pattern is faulty. The long sentence beginning “For instance, if a researcher publishes…” also shifts into “should share” without a clear subject. Review agreement, articles and sentence boundaries, and ensure that conditional sentences retain a clear subject and verb throughout.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.