Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-11-11
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
Now a days, people think that the data about scientific research, business and about the academic world is better to spread as much as possible. But on the other hand some public think that some data is too necessary or very much valuable to spread easily.
Well in these topic, I strongly believe that all necessary data should be available for the general public that are related to their day to day life. But some data should be kept hidden from general public or children or teenegers to keep the society safe and normal.
The people who thinks that scientific research should be available they only think about the positive impact of it. If business data and academic data is available people chould invest in profitable business and make them profitable so in the same way students could choose their future topic to research and study about very easily. So availability of data can be profitable for the general people and students also.
On the other hand who beleive that some imformation should be kept private they have their own logic which is also a very important point of view. And there are some strong reason behind it. If every innovation of scientific research is available for all then chould be threat for the country security. And even business data has a important role in a country's economic sector so the sector could be in denger if all data is available for all even if the academic all information would free then it could be very bad for the education system.
Overall we can say that some data should be availble for all the general public of the country and the world but we also have to remember it could be negative if all data is available for all. Because it has some bad impacts .
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
You discuss both positions and state your own view: you support public access to information relevant to everyday life, while arguing that some material should remain restricted for safety. The examples about investment, students choosing research topics, and national security are relevant. However, the discussion is only partly developed. For instance, you say that unrestricted scientific information could threaten national security, but do not explain what kind of information or how this risk might arise. The claim that free academic information could harm the education system is also unclear and unsupported. To strengthen the response, explain the limits of your position and develop each main reason with a specific example or consequence, so your view is clear and consistently supported.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, a paragraph for each view, and a concluding summary. Transitions such as “on the other hand” help signal the contrast, and the reader can generally follow the main argument. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes unclear, and several ideas are joined without showing their precise relationship. For example, the sentence beginning “If business data and academic data is available” moves from investment to students’ research choices without a clear link. The conclusion repeats the general point rather than drawing the discussion together. Use clearer topic sentences, organise each paragraph around one main reason, and use referencing and linking phrases selectively to make the connections between claims explicit.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate the main ideas, including “scientific research,” “business data,” “innovation,” and “country security.” However, the range is limited and several words or phrases are repeated, particularly “data,” “available,” and “for all.” Some choices are inaccurate or unnatural, such as “too necessary,” “spread easily,” and “bad impacts,” which make parts of the argument less precise. Spelling errors, including “beleive,” “imformation,” and “availble,” are also noticeable. Build a more varied set of expressions for access, confidentiality, and consequences, and check spelling carefully. More precise collocations would help you express the contrast between public benefit and risks of disclosure.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including conditional structures such as “If every innovation … is available for all” and clauses beginning with “who.” However, the range is limited, and complex sentences often contain errors that make the meaning harder to follow. Examples include “The people who thinks,” where the verb does not agree with its subject, and “If business data and academic data is available,” where the subject is plural. Articles and sentence construction are also inconsistent, as in “business data has a important role.” Some punctuation and sentence boundaries need attention, especially in the final paragraph. Practise subject–verb agreement, articles, and building shorter, complete sentences before combining ideas into longer structures.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.