Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In today's world, the exchange of information about research, business and education play a significant role. Some people thimks that the information should be shared completely to help others while others have the opinion that this type of information should be kept confidential and not provided to everyone. I strongly beleived that information should be accessible to everyone but sensitive and valuable information must be protected.

On the one hand, sharing information allows for the development and progress in these fields. When reseachers share scientific information and people read them, they motivated themselves and carry further research on it. One other benefit of sharing information is that the chances of repitition of the same topic becomes less and people focused on further areas. Some people who are new to the fiels may find this information helpful to make new methodolgies and stratigies for the better results.

On the other hand, the sensitive data should definitely be protected to minimize the chances of theft. The data that is the intellectual property of the researcher should not be published on internet or the data from the finance of a company should not be shared freely as it can result in the problematic way.

I personally believe that the scientific and academic data should be in the ramge of everyone as there could be some students and researchers that cannot afford to buy that data or books, which will ultimately affect their research and they will feel demotivated. However the confidential and sensitive data should not be available freely

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You address both views and state a clear position: information should generally be accessible, while sensitive material should be protected. The discussion of research sharing is relevant, especially your point that it can prevent repeated work and help newcomers develop methods. You also identify risks involving intellectual property and company finances. However, these ideas are not equally developed: the benefits receive several explanations, while the risks are asserted more briefly, and the example of students unable to afford research materials could be explained further. The conclusion also ends abruptly rather than fully drawing together your view. To strengthen the response, explain the consequences of each view with a specific example and finish with a complete concluding statement.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a coherent overall arrangement: an introduction, a paragraph supporting wider sharing, a paragraph on confidentiality, and a personal view. Signposting such as “On the one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “I personally believe” helps readers follow the main direction. Some links between ideas are less smooth, however. For example, “One other benefit” introduces a point that could be connected more explicitly to the previous explanation, and the final paragraph shifts from the general position to affordability without a clear transition. The ending also feels incomplete. Use clearer referencing and transitions to show how each example supports your argument, and provide a concluding sentence that summarises the balance you advocate.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic-related vocabulary, including “intellectual property,” “confidential,” “scientific information,” and “sensitive data.” These choices make the main ideas clear, and you attempt more specific terms such as “methodologies” and “strategies.” However, spelling errors and some imprecise or unnatural combinations reduce control: “thimks,” “beleived,” “repitition,” and “ramge” are examples, while “result in the problematic way” does not express the intended consequence naturally. “People read them” is also vague when referring to information. Proofread carefully and choose precise collocations, such as “lead to financial losses” or “research findings,” to make the argument sound more fluent and exact.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including a conditional clause in “as it can result…” and a relative clause in “students and researchers that cannot afford…”. The overall meaning is generally understandable, but some grammatical errors remain. In the opening, the plural subject “the exchange” takes “plays,” not “play”; “Some people thinks” should be “Some people think”; and “When researchers share… and people read them, they motivated themselves” has unclear agreement and tense. There are also awkward sentence patterns, such as “the chances of repetition… becomes less,” where the plural subject requires “become.” Work on subject–verb agreement, consistent tense, and sentence construction, then check punctuation and articles during revision.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.