Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-11-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Information is one of the most important components of communication in our day to day life. The mordenisation of the world has made information easy to be shared in scientific research, business and academic space. While some people believe that sharing information is vital in research, business and academic world, some individuals view information as something that is too valuable to be shared freely. In this essay, both views will be discussed.

Generally, making an informed decision requires people to be informed.

For instance, in a business world, you need to showcase your products through sharing information in order to create awareness. In my opinion, for business to thrive, people must be informed.

In scientific research, information sharing is vital as creates a platform for people to communicate especially during pandemics and clinical trials.This information can be shared through articles, flyers, newspapers and social media platforms.

In academic world, learners acquire knowledge through information that can be obtained during a session, internet, books and articles.This assists a learner to trigger critical thinking and consequently thrive to generate more new information as an independent learner.

On the other hand, some piece of information can be too sensitive to share to the public hence, may need designated officers to share.With holding information that is too valuable to be shared freely can save the organisation from risks and promote confidentality.

In conclusion, information sharing is vital and people must be informed to make their own decision, however, depending on the type of information, some messages ougt to be with held and only be shared by designated officers if need be.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.5
Coherence and Cohesion5.5
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.5
Overall5.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

The response addresses both sides of the discussion and gives a position: sharing information is generally valuable, while sensitive material may need restricted access. The examples about business promotion, research during pandemics, and learning support the first view, and the point about organisational risk represents the opposing view. However, these ideas are mostly asserted rather than explained in depth. For example, the discussion of sensitive information does not identify what kinds of information might be protected or explain the risks in a concrete way. The opening says both views will be discussed, but the writer’s own opinion becomes clearest only near the end. Develop each side with a specific example and state the position more directly in the introduction to make the response more complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs on the benefits of sharing, a paragraph presenting the opposing view, and a conclusion. This makes the main direction understandable. However, progression within the body is somewhat list-like: business, research, and education are each mentioned, but the links between these examples and the central argument are not consistently developed. The transition “On the other hand” clearly signals the change of view, while “In conclusion” marks the ending, but other connections are limited. Some references, such as “This information” and “some messages,” could be more precise. Group related benefits and explain how each example supports the argument; use a wider range of accurate linking and referencing to create smoother progression.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The vocabulary is adequate for discussing information sharing, with relevant terms such as “clinical trials,” “critical thinking,” “sensitive,” and “risks.” The writer also attempts more formal expressions, including “make an informed decision” and “designated officers.” However, several word choices and collocations are inaccurate or awkward, which limits precision: “academic space,” “trigger critical thinking,” and “promote confidentality” do not express the intended ideas naturally. Spelling errors such as “mordenisation,” “ougt,” and “with held” are noticeable, and some wording is repeated, particularly “information” and “share.” Build accuracy by checking spelling and learning common collocations, and vary repeated terms where appropriate, for example with “knowledge,” “research findings,” or “disseminate.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

The response includes both simple sentences and attempts at more complex structures, such as “While some people believe…, some individuals view…” and “depending on the type of information…”. Meaning is generally recoverable, but grammatical errors recur and sometimes make sentences awkward. In “information sharing is vital as creates a platform,” the clause needs a subject (“as it creates”); “for business to thrive, people must be informed” also needs more precise grammatical framing. Articles and plural forms are inconsistent in phrases such as “in academic world” and “some piece of information.” There are also punctuation and spacing problems, including the missing space after “trials.” and “articles.” Aim for more reliable control of clauses, articles, and singular/plural forms, and proofread sentence boundaries and punctuation while retaining the range of structures attempted.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.