Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-11-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In today's modern world, sharing an inormation plays a significant role in scientific research, business and education. Some individuals believe that information should be shared openly to promote development and cooperation. While other argue that some ind=formation sre too valuable to share without restrictions. In my opinion we should spread only those infprmation openly which could not be harmful for anyone's privacy.

One the one hand, some community members believe that sharing information openly bring many benefits to the society as whole. If the researchers and scientist share their knowledge an by working together they can develop many ideas and can find innovative solution of serious predicaments. The best example in our history is COVID19 which is the serious threat for all over the world but this problem is tackled by working together of many international countries who shares their knowledgw eith other developed countries.

On the other hand, there are convincing reasons why some informations should be private. For instance, a company spend a lot of money, time and efforts to innovate new products and technologies, if their ideas are spred to their compititors they may lose their compititive advantage and also financial lose. Consequently, protecting valuable information is essential for privacy, security and economic stability.

In conclusion, some individuals believe that all the information should be spread openly because it is important for development and cooperation. While some other argue that some information are too valuable to shared openly. In my opinion, we should openly spread only those information that cannot be harmful for anyone's privacy.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both perspectives and state a clear position: information should be shared when doing so does not harm privacy. The two body paragraphs are relevant, using international cooperation during COVID-19 to support openness and companies’ investment and competitive advantage to explain why some information should remain protected. This covers the task, but the discussion is unevenly developed. The benefits paragraph focuses mainly on scientific cooperation, with little consideration of information-sharing in business or education, while the risks paragraph gives only one business-related reason. Your conclusion repeats your position rather than drawing the discussion together. To strengthen the response, explain the examples more fully and clarify how your privacy-based position applies across the different fields in the question.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. The progression from the benefits of sharing to the case for protecting information is easy to follow, and signposts such as “On the one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “In conclusion” help orient the reader. This meets the lower-band expectations and shows some stronger control through logical paragraphing. However, cohesion is occasionally mechanical, and the conclusion repeats the opposing views without synthesising them. Some links within sentences are also unclear, particularly “If the researchers and scientist share their knowledge an by working together.” Use more precise connections between cause and result, and make references such as “this problem” clearly identify the point being discussed.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a range of topic-relevant vocabulary, including “innovative solution,” “competitive advantage,” “privacy,” and “economic stability,” which helps communicate the main ideas. There are also attempts at more formal wording, such as “convincing reasons” and “serious predicaments.” However, spelling and word-choice errors are noticeable and sometimes make the reader pause: examples include “inormation,” “ind=formation,” “spred,” and “compititors.” Some expressions are also unnatural or imprecise, such as “international countries” and “spread information.” This limits the accuracy and flexibility of the vocabulary. Proofread carefully, and learn common collocations for discussing research, commercial knowledge, and information protection.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including a conditional sentence beginning “If the researchers and scientist share their knowledge” and a contrast structure with “While.” The overall meaning is generally understandable, but some grammatical errors occur in agreement, articles, plurals, and sentence construction. For example, “sharing information openly bring” needs subject–verb agreement, and “a company spend” should use the singular verb form. The sentence beginning “If the researchers…” is also difficult to follow because its clauses are not joined clearly. In the conclusion, “some information are too valuable to shared” contains agreement and verb-form problems. Practise checking each sentence for a clear subject and verb, and use complex clauses only when their relationships are clear.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.