Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-07-25

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In This concurrent world it is undoubtedly true that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Some concern that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. however ,i quibble from them and propound that both are right on both side . The this essay will further elaborate my reasons for the some my upcoming paragraphs which i will lead to a logical con conclusion.

There are adequate evidence of the view which are substainable . The top notch concrete reasons is people mush believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world .Another private aspects is difficult in future for upcoming genration .The rearmost coherent factor to be considered which cannot be neglacted is share every thing is good. Thus it is clear that scientific research and business and the academic world has certainly undeniably demerits.

what is half full for some may appear half empty to others. So people in general trend to distinguish that some people believe that information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely which has many reasons. To commence with ,some people deem that its help for people in future to study easily and learn. They also uphold to justify if it important information is valuable.

I reiterate that there are plenty of strong factors supporting to share information is best for knowledge to help for others. However, contrary cannot be overload either.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

The response addresses the prompt by acknowledging both sides of the argument, but the development of ideas is significantly lacking. Many sentences are repetitive or vague, such as 'The rearmost coherent factor to be considered which cannot be neglacted is share every thing is good.' The essay fails to provide concrete examples or logical explanations to support the claims made. The position is stated in the introduction but remains unclear throughout the body paragraphs due to a lack of coherent argumentation. The response struggles to move beyond general statements, resulting in an under-developed discussion that does not fully explore the complexities of the topic.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5

The essay is divided into paragraphs, but the internal structure of these paragraphs is weak. While some cohesive devices are used (e.g., 'To commence with', 'However'), they are often used incorrectly or in a way that does not improve the flow of ideas. The progression of the argument is difficult to follow because the sentences often lack logical connection to one another. Referencing is frequently unclear, and the overall organization feels mechanical rather than purposeful. The introduction and conclusion are particularly disjointed, making it challenging for the reader to identify a clear, logical path of reasoning.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary is limited and often used inaccurately. There are several instances of non-standard word choices or malapropisms, such as 'I quibble from them' (likely meaning 'differ' or 'disagree') and 'propound' used in an unnatural context. Phrases like 'concurrent world' and 'rearmost coherent factor' suggest an attempt to use sophisticated language, but the lack of precision hinders clarity. Spelling errors are also present, such as 'substainable' and 'neglacted'. The range of vocabulary is insufficient to express complex ideas clearly, and the frequent misuse of words occasionally causes confusion for the reader.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The response contains frequent grammatical errors that often impede communication. There are consistent issues with subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'There are adequate evidence', 'scientific research... has certainly undeniably demerits'), sentence structure, and punctuation. Many sentences are fragmented or run-on, making them difficult to parse. While there is an attempt to use complex sentence structures, these are almost always faulty, leading to a lack of clarity. The control of grammar is weak, and the high frequency of errors throughout the text significantly impacts the readability of the essay.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.