Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-08-03

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Several individuals consider that it is beneficial to share data as much possible regarding business and academic world . Opponents argue they believe that some sort of information is to crucial that it should be kept as a secret rather than shared with other individuals publicly. This has become a heated argument in this contemporary society. Should individuals transfer information to each other or not this will be discussed in this essay.

Firstly according to some individuals people should share information with each other the reason to that is it assists individuals to gain a lot of knowledge. Studies proves that human learn faster when they hear about something from their from their friends or siblings just by talking about science and research we can learn what other people believe and what we know is it right or not.

in contrast opponents consider that we should not share every thing we hear it can cause misconception and contradiction about many things . Marcus contemplate Aurelius we should not share our secrets cause human can change at any moment we should think before we speak .Several evidences prove this sharing to much makes us weak . We lose the ability of what we should say and what not with the grasp of time.These individuals consider that a person should not share his plans and his source of income . The reason to that we do not know what other person about us . Is he envy or he is happy for me .

As far as i am concerned about sharing information we should be careful .In my perspective it depends on the circumstances we should think before we share contemplate about what i am going to say is it beneficial for me.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0

The essay addresses both sides of the argument and provides a personal opinion, meeting the basic requirements of the prompt. However, the development of ideas is quite limited. For instance, the arguments regarding 'scientific research' and 'business' mentioned in the prompt are largely ignored in favor of general personal advice about sharing secrets. The ideas are under-developed and lack specific examples related to the professional or academic contexts requested. To improve, you should focus on the specific domains mentioned in the prompt, such as intellectual property in business or collaborative research in science, rather than focusing on interpersonal secrets.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0

The essay is organized into paragraphs, which is a positive step. However, the progression of ideas is often disjointed. The use of cohesive devices is mechanical and sometimes inaccurate, such as the abrupt transition 'Marcus contemplate Aurelius'. Referencing is occasionally unclear, and the lack of linking words between sentences makes the flow feel choppy. To reach a higher band, you should use a wider variety of linking words (e.g., 'furthermore', 'consequently', 'on the other hand') and ensure that each paragraph has a clear topic sentence that connects logically to the previous one.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

The vocabulary is generally limited and repetitive. You rely on basic words like 'individuals', 'share', and 'information' throughout the text. There are also instances of word-choice errors, such as 'grasp of time' instead of 'passage of time' and 'to crucial' instead of 'too crucial'. While the meaning is generally clear, the range is not sufficient to demonstrate the flexibility required for higher bands. You should focus on learning collocations and topic-specific vocabulary related to research, business, and ethics to enhance your precision and style.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but the accuracy is inconsistent. There are frequent errors in basic grammar, including subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'Studies proves'), punctuation (missing commas and periods), and article usage. Some sentences are grammatically fragmented or awkward, such as 'The reason to that we do not know what other person about us'. While these errors do not completely prevent communication, they are frequent enough to distract the reader and indicate a lack of control over complex structures.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.