Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-08-18

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

There is an ongoing debate whether information should be shared widely as possible in scientific research, business and academia. While some people argue that limited access to informatioin promotes progress and cooperation, others believe that certain information should be protected because of its economic, ethical or security value. In my view, information should generally be shared, but sensetive or commerically valuable knowledge should only be opened under appropriate conditions.

In the process of sharing information can help the individuals or groups to discover more as they can communicate with the progress. This can help scientific, business or academic research to have more opinions and be shared to a conclusion. Also, it can lead to faster discoveries and more effective solutions to global problems. Easy access to information can gather more journals and databases. Similiarly, businesses can benefit from sharing certain knowledge with partners, as collabration can result in new technologies, more efficient production methods and innnovative products. Therefore, the free exchange of information can help one another to fill in the gaps of missing pieces.

On the other hand, there are strong reasons why some information should not be shared without restrictions. In the business world, companies invest substantial amounts of money in developing products, software and marketing strategies. If their competitors could freely access this information, they could copy successful ideas without making a comparable investment. This can create big problems in political and economical statues. Furthermore, individuals ideas being stolen without the right patent can create unjustice, which can open to local problems. Personal or confidential academic data should also be protected to respect individuals' privacy.

In conclusion, neither complete openness nor complete secrecy is appropriate. The key issues is whether sharing particular information creates great benefits than risks. Reaserch finding that can contribute to public health, education or technological progress should generally be accessible, while confidential business strategies, personal data and potentially dangerous information should be protected. Governments, universities and companies can create clear rules about what can be shared and under what circumstances.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The response addresses all parts of the prompt, discussing both sides of the argument and providing a clear personal opinion. The ideas are relevant and generally well-developed, such as the discussion on intellectual property and competitive advantage in business. However, some arguments, particularly in the second paragraph, are slightly repetitive and could benefit from more specific examples to reach a higher band. The position is consistent throughout the essay, and the conclusion effectively synthesizes the main points. To improve, ensure that each supporting point is fully extended with concrete evidence or logical consequences rather than general statements.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is logically organized with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate distinct ideas. Cohesive devices such as 'In the process of', 'Similarly', and 'On the other hand' are used to guide the reader. However, there are instances where the flow is slightly mechanical or awkward, such as the opening sentence of the second paragraph ('In the process of sharing information can help...'), which contains a grammatical error that disrupts the cohesion. Improving the variety and naturalness of linking phrases would enhance the overall flow.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, with some attempts at more sophisticated terms like 'commercially valuable' and 'intellectual property'. However, there are several spelling errors ('informatioin', 'sensetive', 'commerically', 'innnovative', 'Reaserch') and some awkward collocations ('economical statues', 'create unjustice'). While these errors do not impede communication, they indicate a need for more careful proofreading and a wider range of precise vocabulary. To reach a higher band, focus on using less common lexical items with greater accuracy and ensuring correct spelling.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. There are several grammatical errors, such as the faulty sentence structure in the second paragraph ('In the process of sharing information can help...') and issues with article usage and pluralization ('individuals ideas', 'The key issues is'). While the meaning is generally clear, these errors occur frequently enough to prevent a higher score. To improve, focus on subject-verb agreement and the correct use of prepositions. Increasing the number of error-free complex sentences will also help in achieving a higher band.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.