Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-08-19
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
In recent times a big part of the community think that sharing information for scientific research would help in increase of business and the academic world. Therefore some argue that they should not share information because it is enormously valuable and very important to be forwarded for free. In this essay I would shed light on both views, at last I would share my own perception.
On the one hand, majority of people believe that providing valuable information for the scientific research can help human race to grow faster in technological advancements. It can be valuable in medical researches in order to discovery of new medicine for lethal diseases
such as cancer, tumor, sugar and many more. It may help in futuristic advancement like production of space technology
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 4.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 4.0
The response is significantly under the 250-word minimum requirement, which severely limits the development of ideas. While the essay introduces both sides of the argument, the discussion is incomplete and lacks the depth required for a Task 2 response. The conclusion is missing, and the arguments provided are brief and lack sufficient supporting examples. Because the response is less than 150 words, it fails to address the prompt fully, resulting in a low score for task achievement as the ideas are not developed or extended as required by the rubric.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0
The essay attempts to use basic cohesive devices such as 'In recent times' and 'On the one hand', but the overall structure is fragmented. The paragraphing is incomplete, and the lack of a conclusion makes the progression of ideas feel abrupt. The logical flow is hindered by the brevity of the text, making it difficult to follow a coherent argument. To improve, ensure that each paragraph has a clear topic sentence and that ideas are linked using a wider variety of cohesive devices to guide the reader through your reasoning.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.0
The vocabulary is somewhat limited and repetitive. Phrases like 'big part of the community' and 'enormously valuable' are functional but lack the precision expected at higher levels. There are also some awkward collocations, such as 'increase of business' instead of 'business growth' and 'discovery of new medicine' instead of 'development of new medicines'. The range of vocabulary is insufficient to demonstrate the flexibility required for a higher band score. Expanding your range of academic collocations and synonyms will help improve this score.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0
The response contains several grammatical errors that affect clarity. For example, 'In recent times a big part of the community think' should be 'thinks' to agree with the singular subject. There are also issues with article usage and prepositional phrases, such as 'in order to discovery' which should be 'in order to discover'. While some simple sentences are clear, the range of structures is limited, and the errors are frequent enough to cause some minor difficulty for the reader. Focusing on subject-verb agreement and correct verb forms after 'to' will improve accuracy.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.