Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-08-22

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Information is the backbone of effective tasks related to all fields in the world. Some persons advocate sharing all the information for educational as well as business purposes, while others believe that only limited information should be shared, as some data is too important to share freely. Before sharing my own opinion, I shall discuss both points of view.

According to proponents, sharing of more information drives scientific commercial innovation, which creates convenience for humanity. To strengthen their argument, they cite the example of growth in the artificial intelligence sector.In 2010, only a few people had knowledge about AI, but due to shared knowledge, it has since produced advanced tools that benefit both researchers and everyday users. AI's rapid growth stems from open research publications.

In contrast, critics have an argument that sharing of all information is not good, as some information is so critical that some individuals may misuse certain information in ways that threaten society. To illustrate their point, they provide the example of the creation of the atomic bomb. Till the middle of the 20th century only a few countries knew about it, but now nine nations possess nuclear arsenals. The spread of these weapons has contributed to an imbalance of power and created a serious threat to human life.

After discussing both views, I conclude that while widespread information sharing is beneficial, it is not suitable for all contexts, as only limited information should be restricted, which is more beneficial.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

The response addresses both sides of the argument and provides a clear personal opinion. However, the essay falls short of the 250-word minimum requirement (244 words), which negatively impacts the task achievement score. While the ideas are relevant, the development is somewhat brief. The conclusion is a bit vague, as it mentions that 'only limited information should be restricted' without clearly explaining how this balance should be achieved in practice. To improve, ensure you expand on your supporting examples and provide a more detailed synthesis of your position to meet the length requirement and demonstrate deeper critical thinking.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is logically organized with a clear introduction, two body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate the two opposing views. Cohesive devices such as 'According to proponents,' 'In contrast,' and 'To illustrate their point' are used effectively to guide the reader through the argument. However, the transition between the final body paragraph and the conclusion is slightly abrupt. The overall flow is coherent, and the progression of ideas is easy to follow, though the brevity of the response limits the complexity of the cohesive structure.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, with some good topic-specific terms like 'scientific commercial innovation,' 'artificial intelligence,' and 'nuclear arsenals.' However, the range is somewhat limited, and there is a reliance on simpler phrasing. Some word choices are slightly repetitive, such as the frequent use of 'information' and 'share.' To reach a higher band, try to incorporate more sophisticated synonyms and collocations, such as 'dissemination of data' or 'proprietary knowledge,' to demonstrate a wider and more precise lexical range.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The essay demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. Most sentences are grammatically sound, and errors are infrequent and do not impede communication. For example, 'In 2010, only a few people had knowledge about AI, but due to shared knowledge, it has since produced advanced tools...' is a well-constructed complex sentence. There are minor issues with article usage and phrasing, such as 'sharing of more information' (should be 'the sharing of information'). Overall, the control of grammar is solid, but more variety in complex structures would be beneficial for a higher score.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.