Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-08-23
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
People have differing views about whether important informations should be shared or not in scientific research, business and the academic. This essay will examine both perspective before arguing that wide access to research findings and knowledge have a significant role to paly in development of nation.
On the one hand, the dissimination of knowledge can accelerate progress. A greater exposure to information can fascilitate collaboration in several sectors : research centres and business, while it enables students to strengthen understanding of subjects. For instance, details about developing fields like artificial intelligance can encourage further and sophisticated innovations. In research laboratories , scientists can use informations to create history. Afterall , cooperation between community is needed to achieve whole success.
On the other hand, people can misuse the details for their personal benefits. Due to technological advancements, cyber fruads are increasing. Over access to valuable informations leads to digital crimes. Furthermore, for ethical reasons data privacy is mandetory, because digital thieves can leak them. For example, patency of certain ideas and projects is essential for growth of a business firm or a nation as a whole in every sectors. Eventually to survive in global competition, data privacy is necessary.
To conclude, although there are multiple drawbacks of sharing information, it is important for growth of the youth, because cooperative and coordinated approach is always a wiser decision. I think a balanced sharing between sensative and useful informations is important.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5
The essay addresses both sides of the argument and provides a clear personal opinion. However, the response falls short of the 250-word minimum requirement, which limits the depth of development. While the ideas are relevant, they are somewhat underdeveloped; for instance, the point about 'patency' (patents) is introduced but not fully explained in the context of the broader debate. The conclusion is brief and does not fully synthesize the arguments presented. To reach a higher band, you must expand your supporting examples and ensure the word count is met to allow for a more comprehensive exploration of the topic.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5
The essay is logically organized into clear paragraphs, each with a distinct focus. Cohesive devices such as 'On the one hand', 'On the other hand', and 'Furthermore' are used to guide the reader. However, the flow is occasionally mechanical, and some transitions feel abrupt. Referencing is generally clear, but the progression of ideas within paragraphs could be smoother. The structure is functional, but it lacks the sophisticated, varied linking required for higher bands. Improving the variety of cohesive devices and ensuring they are used more naturally would enhance the overall coherence.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.5
You demonstrate an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, including terms like 'dissemination', 'sophisticated', and 'collaboration'. However, there are several persistent errors in word choice and form, such as 'informations' (information is uncountable), 'patency' (should be 'patents'), and 'over access' (should be 'excessive access'). Additionally, there are spelling errors like 'dissimination', 'fascilitate', 'intelligance', and 'mandetory'. These errors occasionally distract the reader. To improve, focus on the correct usage of uncountable nouns and proofread carefully for spelling accuracy.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5
The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. While you attempt complex sentences, there are frequent grammatical errors, particularly with articles ('the development of nation' should be 'the development of a nation') and subject-verb agreement. Punctuation is also inconsistent, with unnecessary spaces before colons and commas. While these errors do not completely impede communication, they are frequent enough to lower the score. Increasing the variety of complex structures and focusing on basic grammatical accuracy, especially regarding articles and pluralization, will help improve your score.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.